Newsletter, 9/15/25

Biomedical; 4IR (Charlie Kirk!)

Biomedical. An item which also crosses over into 9/11-like false flag ops, What’s Left? talks with Fabio Vighi about the “COVID” Psyop and how it related to the global economic crisis and to measures intended to implement the 4IR global digital prison. Disclosure: Like the members of What’s Left?, Fabio is a friend of mine. This was recorded before the Charlie Kirk event, which is why it doesn’t come up.

Fabio Vighi, the Covid Op & Emergency Capitalism, What’s Left?,9/13/25, an hour and 47 minutes.

"Fabio Vighi (one of the few Marxists to understand that the pandemic was an OP and exposed its economic roots) joins us to discuss some of his ideas in his new book, Emergency Capitalism. Check us out! "

Here are my comments at the page, consolidated and edited for clarity.

Thanks, Andy, Kenny, Michael, and Fabio!!

Good description by Fabio of how capitalism is at an impasse, eliminating human labor from the production process even though that human labor is the only source of surplus value which sustains capitalism. And how the capitalists keep trying to build up more debt as a remedy, only digging their graves deeper. Discussed BlackRock’s idea from August 2019 of “Going Direct,” which was implemented several months later when it was enabled by “COVID.” Savaged those who attacked “Conspiracy Theory pushers" by noting how so much of history, including the history of capitalism, was enabled via conspiracies.

Michael noted how “marketing” is nothing more than a conspiracy to create demand for products which are largely if not totally unneeded. Thanks for standing up for Marx's theory of value, it is totally valid. And yeah, Andy, living labor is the source of surplus value, not dead labor, which just transfers the value stored in it by living labor. Capital has no exit.

Moving past capitalism is just not an option. The capitalists are not especially smart, or especially strong, or especially good at technology. Their social power comes from their control of large chunks of capital. Do away with capitalism, and they get cut down to their small sizes. And thanks, Andy, for bringing up the problem of energy/raw materials needs which would be needed for any hi tech system to survive, at the time that the supplies of energy and raw materials are in fact dwindling, a physical reality of a finite planet.

Excellent point, Fabio, around 1:15:00, i”COVID” was a world event which was a history-changing "defining moment," enabling a major step-up in authoritarian control, just like 9/11.

Good point by Andy about the multiple benefits of the shutdown for capital, not just "Going Direct" but also vastly increasing data collection in the US. and the rest of the West. And good point by Fabio about the capitalists steering the system rather than controlling it, , "nudging" people into the global digital prison. As to why did so many Marxists get 2020 wrong. Well, they got 9/11 wrong, they got WW1 wrong,.... Most people who call themselves "Marxists" just never really got Marx.

Thanks, Kenny, for bringing up Nicaragua in 2018 as showing the capitalist nature of that state/business entity. And good follow-up by Fabio re how many "leftists" thought the "COVID" shutdown was bringing down capitalism, when in fact it was capital increasing its control of society. Fabio at Stanford? Oh? Yeah!! [NOTE: Search for “Cinematic Capital” and Vighi’s name at the Stanford U page, the event will be Monday 10/15/25 4 to 5:30 local time]

One thing i do need to say. Capital has been going financial vs production since the 19th Century, Marx wrote about it in the Grundrisse and in Capital. Financial activity can do nothing more than create fictitious values, he noted, and the movement of investments toward financialization is a sign of a growing crisis, not its overcoming. We saw debt bubbles before the global crisis around 1910 which let to WW1, and the global crisis in the '30s which led to WW2. Why would financialization in the 21st Century lead to a different outcome? Looking forward to reading the book!

Response by What’s Left.[Andy]

I brought it up but like me, I am not sure Fabio knew what to say about it. But a regular contradiction of Capitalism is the necessity for exponential growth under the circmstances of linear growth or even no growth...and the crisis that results. I guess you are just pointing to one more way that crisis is an inevitability built into Capitalism. [Though that’s a BIG factor now, vs during past crises] Like you, I do not think the Capitalist will find a way out because the ONLY way they could is by truly understanding the nature of the system that benefits them. I don't see them ever doing that and I don't see any material conditions which will propel them to do that. They will just build their bunkers deeper..store more food and resources in them and then light the candle...and go underground. That's their only revolutionary solution to the system they love so much but understand so little.

My response.

Well-said. They gave up their very ability to understand what';s going on back in the late 19th Century when they ditched Political Economy, which had a bit of touch with reality, in favor of Economics, which was structurally built upon a denial of that reality and the complete focus on managing their individual enterprises vs a systemic understanding.

And, celebrations by “freedom” people of Florida’s seeming abandonment of vaccine mandates was badly premature, as the state retreats on all fronts regarding this matter. How long will people continue to foolishly believe in politicians of either ruling party?

Florida vaccine mandate rollback falters after Trump criticism. Surgeon general Joseph Ladapo retreats on his plans after the US president says: ‘You have vaccines that work.’ Richard Luscombe in Miami.. 9/14/25.

It took barely two days, and some huffs of disapproval from the White House, before Joseph Ladapo’s bold plan to eliminate all vaccine mandates in Florida began to deflate.

The action, the fervently religious state surgeon general had asserted at a fire and brimstone press conference in Tampa, came straight from the heavens: “Who am I, as a man standing here now, to tell you what you should put in your body?” he opined, framing the freedom to reject vaccines as a “reflection of God’s light against the darkness of tyranny and oppression”. Mandates were akin to “slavery”, he said, in comments presumably intended to align with the ongoing anti-vaccination campaign of misinformation and myth of the health secretary, Robert F Kennedy. [He’s actually not been doing that at all, in fact promoting a new “ universal flu vaccine” whjich HHS id supposedly developing] The Florida department of health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law. All of them. Every last one of them,” he insisted.

It turns out, however, that parents, public health experts, many Republican politicians and even the president himself, quite like the idea that children being sent to school are protected from, and protecting others against, highly contagious diseases such as measles, polio and chickenpox. [Reminder: there is no scientific proof any of these is contagious, something admitted by numerous public health entities via responses to FOIA requests] Now, Florida’s health department is walking back the scale of Ladapo’s commitment. They have acknowledged that he doesn’t have the power to arbitrarily chop every mandate he promised he would. And the lawmakers who do, Florida’s Republican-dominated legislature that has traditionally walked in lockstep with Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor and Ladapo’s champion, are so far showing reluctance to get involved.

4IR. Today, a BUNCH of stuff about the Charlie Kirk event, which seems to have lots of features smacking of a 9/11-like False Flag operation.

There’s been a slew of videos on social media claiming that Zionists had Kirk killed because he was allegedly starting to publicly oppose Israeli policies. I got one of them from a friend who wanted to run it by me, got it from his brother. I responded with this. See here.

In some of his final public appearances, Kirk – who regularly bashed Islam and Muslims – promoted the unfounded conspiracy theory that Islam and the political left are working together to undermine the US and Europe. “Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America,” he wrote in a social media post on Tuesday, a day before he was shot.

Several Israeli politicians underscored Kirk’s ties to Israel while lauding his views. For example, former Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz described Kirk as a “voracious defender of Judeo-Christian values, America & the State of Israel”. The term “Judeo-Christian values” appeals to mainstream US conservatives, but critics say it aims to exclude Muslims and other religious groups from Western societies. They also argue that it is ahistorical, given the hostility and anti-Semitism Jewish communities have faced in Christian societies in Europe over the past centuries. But “Judeo-Christian values” were a recurring theme in the Israeli eulogies for Kirk.


I added this in my response to my friend.: "For some people everything starts and ends with Zionism and Israel. Even 19th Century US policies in Latin America and the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous inhabitants of North America.”

Also, a video by Charlie Kirk has been posted widely on Instagram and Facebook. in it, he stated that his two best trips ever were the two trips he took to Israel, and spewed a bunch of ani-Muslim stuff.

A subsequent comment by Coppolino at his FB page. THE EVENT IS SO 9/11-ISH!!

"So — it would appear that Charlie’s team starts to strike the set just four minutes after he’s removed to a waiting vehicle. The set in that case is a crime scene which his aides dismantled including their own cameras, and no yellow tape was put up to prevent disturbance. No blood, no blood spatter on the white-colored back wall, no ambulance, no crime scene security — nada.”

And a friend of mine named Wendy posted this comment at Coppolino’s FB page. I am posting it without highlighting, except for the source used. as the entire thing needs to be read. I thank her.

Here is Thesis VII of Comments on the Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord, written in 88...see if it makes sense in context of what is happening today:

With the destruction of history, contemporary events themselves retreat into a fabulous distance, among its unverifiable stories, uncheckable statistics, unlikely explanations and untenable reasoning. For every imbecile who has advanced spectacularly, there are only the mediatics who can respond with a few respectful rectifications or remonstrations, and they are miserly, for besides their extreme ignorance, their personal and professional solidarity with the spectacle’s general authority and the society it expresses, makes it their duty, and their pleasure, never to diverge from that authority whose majesty must not be damaged. It must not be forgotten that all mediatics, through wages and other rewards and recompenses, has a master, and sometimes to several; and that every one of them knows he is dispensable.

All experts are mediatics-Statists and only in that way are they recognized as experts. Every expert follows his master, because all former possibilities for independence have been almost been reduced to nil by present society’s conditions of organization. The most useful expert, of course, is the one who lies. Those who need experts are, for different reasons, falsifiers and ignoramuses. Whenever individuals lose the capacity to see things for themselves, the expert is there to offer a formal reassurance. Once there were experts in Etruscan art, and competent ones, for Etruscan art was not for sale. But a period which, for example, finds it profitable to fake by chemical means various famous wines, can only sell them if it has created wine experts able to con connoisseurs into admiring their new, more recognizable flavors.[7] Cervantes remarks that “under a poor cloak you often find a good drinker.”[8] Someone who knows his wine may often understand nothing about the rules of the nuclear industry, but spectacular domination calculates that if one expert can make a fool of him with nuclear industry, another can easily do the same with wine. And it is well known, for example, that experts in mediatic meteorology, forecasting temperature or rainfall for the next forty-eight hours, are severely limited in what they say by the obligation to maintain certain economic, touristic and regional balances, when so many people make so many journeys on so many roads, between so many equally desolate places; thus they can only try to make their names as entertainers.

One aspect of the disappearance of all objective historical knowledge manifests itself concerning any personal reputation, which has become malleable and correctable at will by those who control all information, those who collect it and also those — an entirely different matter — who diffuse it. Their license to falsify is thus unlimited. Historical evidence, of which, in the spectacle, one does not want to know, is no longer evidence. When the only fame is that bestowed as a favor by the grace of a spectacular Court, disgrace may instantaneously follow. An anti-spectacular notoriety is becoming something extremely rare. I myself am one of the last people to possess one, having never had any other. But it has also become extraordinarily suspect. Society has officially declared itself to be spectacular. To be known outside spectacular relations is already to be known as an enemy of society.

It is permitted to change a person’s whole past, radically modify it, recreate it in the manner of the Moscow trials — and without even having recourse to the clumsiness of a trial. One can kill at less cost.[9] Those who govern the integrated spectacular, or their friends, surely have no lack of false witnesses, though they may be unskilled — but what capacity to detect this clumsiness can remain among the spectators who will be witnesses to the exploits of the false witnesses? — or false documents, which are always highly effective. Thus it is no longer possible to believe anything about anyone that you have not learned for yourself, directly. But in fact false accusations are rarely necessary. Once one controls the mechanism that operates the only form of social verification to be fully and universally recognized, one can say what one likes. The movement of the spectacular demonstration proves itself simply by going round in circles: by coming back to the start, by repetition, by constant reaffirmation on the unique terrain where anything can be publicly affirmed, and be made believed, precisely because that is the only thing to which everyone is witness. Spectacular authority can similarly deny whatever it likes, once, or three times over, and say that it will no longer speak of it and speak of something else instead, knowing full well there is no danger of any other riposte, on its own terrain or any other.

For the agora, the general community, no longer exists, nor even communities restricted to intermediary bodies or to autonomous institutions, to salons or cafes, or to workers in a single company; no place where people can discuss the realities which concern them, because they can never lastingly free themselves from the crushing presence of mediatic discourse and of the various forces organized to relay it. Nothing remains of the guaranteed relatively independent judgment of those who once made up the world of learning; of those, for example, who used to base their pride on their ability to verify, to come close to what one called an impartial history of facts, or at least to believe that such a history deserved to be known. There is no longer even any incontestable bibliographical truth, and the computerized catalogues of national libraries are well-equipped to better suppress the traces. It is disorienting to consider what it meant to be a judge, a doctor or a historian not so long ago, and to recall the imperative obligations they often recognized, within the limits of their competence: men resemble their times more than their fathers.[10]
When the spectacle stops talking about something for three days, it is as if it did not exist. For it has then gone on to talk about something else, and it is that which henceforth, in short, exists. The practical consequences, as we see, are enormous.

We believe we know that in Greece, history and democracy appeared at the same time. We can prove that their disappearances have also been simultaneous.
To this list of the triumphs of power we should, however, add one result which has proved negative for it: a State, in which one has durably installed a great deficit of historical knowledge so as to manage it, can no longer be governed strategically.

Regarding the alleged perpetrator Tyler Robinson.This item all day Sunday topped the Guardian’s web page. The matter is now being cast in terms of pro and anti transgender people. Choose your binary side, just like zoonotic transfer vs lab-leaked bioweapon.
Shooting suspect had ‘very different ideology’ than conservative family, Utah governor says, Spencer Cox says suspect had been ‘radicalized’, and had a romantic partner transitioning from male to female. Ramon Antonio Vargas and Anna Betts, 9/14/25.

The Utah governor, Spencer Cox, on Sunday told national talkshows that the man suspected of killing Turning Point USA executive director Charlie Kirk was living with and in a relationship with a person “transitioning from male to female” as investigators continue exploring a possible motive in the attack.

Eric Francis Coppolino did an excellent show on Friday night, focusing on the Kirk event. raising doubts about what actually happened, noting the paucity of details in the media about the actual event. He has been getting a LOT of flak, especially from MAGA people, for raising some rather straight forward questions.

Planet Waves FM :: Violence as the quest for identity. What do we presume is real, and why?

The chart for the incident involving Charlie Kirk reveals two layers of reality, the visible and the invisible. We will look at both. Shri Yantra on self love as the path to healing.. 9/12/25.

Written analysis of the astrology of the Charlie Kirk incident

— Additional notes about intel involvment in the U.S. student movement are in this short article

— Which includes discussion of a famous 1967 article in Ramparts. In that episode, the CIA was shown over the prior 15 years to have infiltrated what was then called the National Student Assocation.

I discuss this on tonight’s program as well.

— Link to Charlie Kirk: Turning Point or TV Plot? by Miri AF [This one has some head-spinning details, sure raises lots of questions]
The item is titled Charlie Kirk: Turning Point or TV Plot?. Miri AF


My comments at the Planet Waves page, consolidated and edited for clarity.
The first two segments, go up to 1:40:00. Excellent point in segment1, we really don't have any solid proof of what happened. Coming right around the anniversary of the fully staged event known as 9/11, and five and a half years after the even-more-staged event known as the "COVID" Psyyop (which did not even involve an evidenced physical event or events), asking questions is wise, indeed i'd say mandatory.

And some really mind-blowing thoughts in Segment 2. Yes, Kirk arose out of being a complete unknown to become the leader of a newly created student movement. Very astroturf-like. Questions about the shooting. And particularly questions about the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. Spooky that the chart cannot be aligned in any way with the event. I posted this in today's edition of Lockdown Times.[See the Friday 9/12/25 edition of L

Re Segment 3. Excellent point: after 9/11 and 3/11 (the "COVID" Psyop), how can people NOT ask questions about any event reported and pushed by the mass media or at least feel that questions are appropriate? And a great way to describe the situation, an official narrative and an official "alternative" narrative are presented as the binary we are limited to choosing from. So much of the "opposition" regarding both 9/11 as well as 3/11 remains stuck within the official "alternative.”


And, i’ll add this comment i’ve posted on Coppolino’s pages.
Ny two key takeaways from this GREAT presentation.

What's on TV (and mass media in total) is there for a reason, intended to disorient you, and NOT to inform you.

And the key is not your conclusions, but your method of getting there, the PROCESS.

Ending this segment and this edition, more big signs of deflation ahead. Texas unemployment claims shoot straight up, while the U of Michigan survey shows consumers are not happy about the present, and even more worried about future prospects.

Texas Gives MASSIVE Warning to America, Jeff Snider/Eurodollar University, 9/14/25, 21 minutes.

"The oil business is heading for a big bust, putting Texas in the crosshairs. While that's obviously not good for the economy as a whole, energy does tend to be a leading indicators and when the jobs starting being lost in the space in a big way it's a big red flag. Consumers know it, given what was also just reported from them, too."