Biomedical. Dr Sam Bailey turns her examining eyes to the dengue fever story, and once again shreds an official story.
The Dengue Drop Shot, Dr Sam Bailey, 3/12/24, 22 minutes.
[Link to show notes page. From it,….]
We are expected to believe that “pathogens” are coming at us with increasing frequency and usually these are in the form of claimed viruses. The dengue “virus” was purportedly discovered in the early 1900s, hot on the heels of another alleged mosquito-transmitted ‘germ’ in the form of the Yellow Fever “virus”.
There are many inconsistencies with the dengue story including how deadly it is supposed to be, why the cases are increasing, why it only appears in certain neighbourhoods, and crucially, how the “cases” are actually defined.
As we outlined in our new book The Final Pandemic, all “pandemics” lead to vaccines and dengue is no different with the rush now on to get more shots to market. In this video, we bring to light the human experiments performed more than a century ago, investigate the virologists’ use of the word “isolation”, and show why the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement remains out of reach for them.[Links]
My comments, Superb as usual. The history of this said disease and the pathogen associated with it shows an unceasing pattern of violations of the scientific method, starting with experiments which are neither controlled nor blind, and going right up to the modern era and “sequencing” genomes alleged to be those of pathogens by using short segments of nucleic acid to build up genome models on a computer and to test for these alleged pathogens via chemical procedures such as the PCR which are based upon short segments of these computer code models, never shown to be either viral nor pathogenic.
And, Christine Massey extends her FOIA requests to new fields, exposes more fraud in high places.
Christine Massey, 3/11/24, too late for the last edition of LT.
Greetings and Best Wishes,
This is a very brief (22 min) update from no-virus colleague and Justice for Jabbed advocate courtenay on the Isle of Man.[Link] courtenay is a former healthcare innovation advisor in “Isle of Man Government’s” Cabinet Office. He is now being demonized and coerced to attend “court” again tomorrow (Tuesday March 12, 2024) for "sentencing" with the possibility of imprisonment for, via emails and tweets, identifying and attempting to prevent crimes/trespasses.
Please join me in sending him best wishes, prayers, good vibes, etc. for tomorrow. courtenay on twitter [Link] courtenay's website: Justice for Jabbed [Link]
NO VIRUSES MANN:
UPDATE FROM COURTENAY OF RHUMSAA MARCH 9 2024
[Link]
“Germ” FOIs Summary
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (220 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:[Link]
Excel file listing 220 institutions:[Link]
FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):[Link]
FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated "virus genomes":[Link]
3000+ pages of "virus" FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology:[Link]
Failed freedom of Information responses re contagion:[Link]
Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease? [Link]
Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don't exist and virology isn't a science.
For truth, freedom and sanity. - Christine
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 3/11/24.. Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
Thanks, Christine. Purveyors of the official story, including many "freedom" people, are all playing the little Dutch boy trying to use his fingers to plug growing holes in the official "virus proven to exist, isolated, sequenced,..." narrative.
And, Christine Massey followed up the next day with further reporting on the No-Virus Mann case.
Rachel Glover, Isle of Man "covid" / PCR fraudster, Christine Massey, 3/12/24.
Greetings and Best Wishes,
Rachel Glover is a PCR fraudster who got courtenay on Isle of Man sentenced to 8+ months in jail this morning - for pointing out and trying to prevent crime/trespasses. (You can find many virology and PCR resources here) [Links] Rachel was heavily involved in the fraudulent/delusional testing for the imaginary “SARS-COV-2” on the island. Some of the drama surrounding her involvement is documented here.[Link, screen shot with link]
I challenged Rachel on March 8th to cite valid scientific evidence of any “coronavirus” (anyone could do the same, here). (The IOM Department of Health and Social Care officially failed that test when challenged by courtenay back in January 2022.)
No response from Rachel yet and I’m not expecting a response from the pseudoscientist - because there is no scientific evidence to cite.[Screen shots]
Below (and here) Rachel is seen on video during a radio publicity stunt, claiming to see DNA and judge its quality with her naked eye and sometimes "almost pick it up in strands”.[Links]
courtenay and I spoke a few days before the clown court ruling:
NO VIRUSES MANN:
UPDATE FROM COURTENAY OF RHUMSAA MARCH 9 2024 [Link to part I of the series, which is also repeated here text-wise and links]
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 5:30PM, 3/12/24, US Pacific Time.. Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
"Below (and here) Rachel is seen on video during a radio publicity stunt, claiming to see DNA and judge its quality with her naked eye and sometimes "almost pick it up in strands". "
Glover is a class-A charlatan, worthy of the Poornima Wagh Award. Thanks for holding her to scientific standards, Christine.
4IR. A very interesting discussion regarding how grain-based agriculture and later capitalism created fundamental shifts in the way human beings related to the planet.
How Economics Overpowers Culture | Lisi Krall, Planet: Critical (Rachel Donald), 4/5/23. an hour and 15 minutes.
"How can we change an economic system that has a life of its own? 10,000 years ago, homo sapiens began farming a grain surplus. This surplus led to the creation of societal and cultural hierarchies which divorced our species from our long relationship with the natural world. This week’s guest, Lisi Krall, argues that our current economic system of fossil-fuelled capitalism is an interpretation of that same system—and we must repair our relationship to the more-than-human world if we are to change the system. But it is a momentous challenge. One, she argues, we must not think culture alone can overcome.
Lisi Krall is a Professor of Economics at the State University of New York Cortland where she researches political economy, human ecology, and the evolution of economic systems. She's also the author of Bitter Harvest: An Inquiry Into The War Between Economy And Earth. She explains how systems self-propagate, evolve and dominate culture, arguing acts of local resistance are key to building a sustainable world, and warns against projects like the Green New Deal, which she claims is the status quo masquerading as the solution.
00:00 Intro
03:07 The Economic Superorganism
06:45 How agriculture affected us
08:55 Surplus and Hierarchy
15:13 How the economy self propagates
25:51 Systems change & culture
39:34 Renewable Energy is not the solution
44:22 Reduction & Redistribution
54:30 Creating Ecological Economics
58:40 Conservation
01:05:36 Duality of earth and human world
01:12:20 Who would you like to platform?
[Links] "
My comments. Capitalism constitutes the continuation of what grain-based agriculture initiated, namely humanity adapting the world to suit our needs vs adapting to the world, the economic super organism. The advent of grain-based agriculture societies brought forth a duality between humans and the more-than-human world. Humans became configured by the human-made social system rather than configured by the earth Agriculture’s creation of a system based around the production of a surplus left to hierarchy, and the developed elites have required continued surpluses in order to survive as elites.
[Her description of the imposition of agriculture dovetails well with that made by eminent historian James C. Scott in his 2017 book, “Against the Drain,” even if i have a few specific disagreements with him]
Capitalism is a special version of the economic super organism. Material surplus production replaced by the production of surplus value. A key aspect is that EVERYONE is involved, be they capitalists, workers, or other. This is a key aspect of the existential problem we face: There is more involved than “greedy corporations,” as everyone has a stake in the status quo. Markets evolved before the industrial revolution, as did capitalism (which re-made markets in its own image), in fact the development of capitalism drove that revolution into being. The system functions as if it is not connected to its bio-physical roots
[Jeff: and this notion reaches ever new heights with the digital society and the digital disembodiment of humans]
The system is far more than culture. The global capitalist system is exterminating culture, replacing indigenous and local cultures with adaptations of the same global techno way of being. Modern culture has become a drag on social adaptation, as people seek the maintenance of the status-quo by any means necessary. Krall is very positive about local resistance efforts, and quite negative about “the Green New Deal,” which she sees as a continuation of the same core problem techno-fix behavior, based on the same old human-ingenuity-will-overcome-all-problems myth. Its advocates totally overlook the fatal flaws such as the low Energy Return to Energy Invested ratio, the need for vast storage facilities, We need a rapprochement with the more-than-human world.
Krall is good at describing the problem. As is all too often the case with people like her, she falters when it comes to how do we get out of this. She voices fears that humanity is so tied up in the global capitalist system that it’s impossible to predict what could happen as this system starts unraveling in the face of its mounting crises, including the inevitable energy/materials shortages. She proposes taking out activities such as energy production, child care,.. out of the private system, but doesn’t explain how this could be done. Seems like she advocates a state takeover. And who runs the state? How is the state financed? Those questions were not even raised. So don’t look for any magic solutions here.
On a subsequent program, Donald interviewed Bob Jensen, a former professor from the U of Texas who was published quite often in progressive media earlier this century. Krall in fact recommended him as someone Donald should talk to. He rails against hierarchy, pointing out correctly that if anything, human history shows that social hierarchy is NOT natural, is in contradiction with the vast majority of our existence as humans. But he too falters when it comes to “what do we do?” He raises the idea that a population of 8 billion humans is not sustainable, but admits he has no idea how we can more to gradually lower that population. I would still recommend that interview as worthwhile.
Ending this edition, a look at Net Zero policies being proposed globally. Good in places, and totally awful when it comes to understanding the climate crisis, which he conflates with official policies to supposedly deal with it. See my critical note which follows these excerpts,
Net Zero, the Digital Panopticon and the Future of Food , Colin Todhunter, 3/12/24.
The food transition, the energy transition, net-zero ideology, programmable central bank digital currencies, the censorship of free speech and clampdowns on protest. What’s it all about? To understand these processes, we need to first locate what is essentially a social and economic reset within the context of a collapsing financial system. Writer Ted Reece notes that the general rate of profit has trended downwards from an estimated 43% in the 1870s to 17% in the 2000s. By late 2019, many companies could not generate enough profit. Falling turnover, squeezed margins, limited cashflows and highly leveraged balance sheets were prevalent.
Professor Fabio Vighi of Cardiff University has described how closing down the global economy in early 2020 under the guise of fighting a supposedly new and novel pathogen allowed the US Federal Reserve to flood collapsing financial markets (COVID relief) with freshly printed money without causing hyperinflation. Lockdowns curtailed economic activity, thereby removing demand for the newly printed money (credit) in the physical economy and preventing ‘contagion’.
According to investigative journalist Michael Byrant, €1.5 trillion was needed to deal with the crisis in Europe alone. The financial collapse staring European central bankers in the face came to a head in 2019. The appearance of a ‘novel virus’ provided a convenient cover story. The European Central Bank agreed to a €1.31 trillion bailout of banks followed by the EU agreeing to a €750 billion recovery fund for European states and corporations. This package of long-term, ultra-cheap credit to hundreds of banks was sold to the public as a necessary programme to cushion the impact of the pandemic on businesses and workers.
In response to a collapsing neoliberalism, we are now seeing the rollout of an authoritarian great reset — an agenda that intends to reshape the economy and change how we live.
Shift to authoritarianism
The new economy is to be dominated by a handful of tech giants, global conglomerates and e-commerce platforms, and new markets will also be created through the financialisation of nature, which is to be colonised, commodified and traded under the notion of protecting the environment. In recent years, we have witnessed an overaccumulation of capital, and the creation of such markets will provide fresh investment opportunities (including dodgy carbon offsetting Ponzi schemes) for the super-rich to park their wealth and prosper.
This great reset envisages a transformation of Western societies, resulting in permanent restrictions on fundamental liberties and mass surveillance. Being rolled out under the benign term of a ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’, the World Economic Forum (WEF) says the public will eventually ‘rent’ everything they require (remember the WEF video ‘you will own nothing and be happy’?): stripping the right of ownership under the guise of a ‘green economy’ and underpinned by the rhetoric of ‘sustainable consumption’ and ‘climate emergency’.
Climate alarmism and the mantra of sustainability are about promoting money-making schemes. But they also serve another purpose: social control. Neoliberalism has run its course, resulting in the impoverishment of large sections of the population. But to dampen dissent and lower expectations, the levels of personal freedom we have been used to will not be tolerated. This means that the wider population will be subjected to the discipline of an emerging surveillance state.
To push back against any dissent, ordinary people are being told that they must sacrifice personal liberty in order to protect public health, societal security (those terrible Russians, Islamic extremists or that Sunak-designated bogeyman George Galloway) or the climate. Unlike in the old normal of neoliberalism, an ideological shift is occurring whereby personal freedoms are increasingly depicted as being dangerous because they run counter to the collective good.[NOT THE FIRST TIME!]
The real reason for this ideological shift is to ensure that the masses get used to lower living standards and accept them. Consider, for instance, the Bank of England’s chief economist Huw Pill saying that people should ‘accept’ being poorer. And then there is Rob Kapito of the world’s biggest asset management firm BlackRock, who says that a “very entitled” generation must deal with scarcity for the first time in their lives.
At the same time, to muddy the waters, the message is that lower living standards are the result of the conflict in Ukraine and supply shocks that both the war and ‘the virus’ have caused. The net-zero carbon emissions agenda will help legitimise lower living standards (reducing your carbon footprint) while reinforcing the notion that our rights must be sacrificed for the greater good. You will own nothing, not because the rich and their neoliberal agenda made you poor but because you will be instructed to stop being irresponsible and must act to protect the planet…………
Net-zero agenda
But what of this shift towards net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and the plan to slash our carbon footprints? Is it even feasible or necessary? Gordon Hughes, a former World Bank economist and current professor of economics at the University of Edinburgh, says in a new report that current UK and European net-zero policies will likely lead to further economic ruin. Apparently, the only viable way to raise the cash for sufficient new capital expenditure (on wind and solar infrastructure) would be a two decades-long reduction in private consumption of up to 10 per cent. Such a shock has never occurred in the last century outside war; even then, never for more than a decade.
But this agenda will also cause serious environmental degradation. So says Andrew Nikiforuk in the article The Rising Chorus of Renewable Energy Skeptics, which outlines how the green techno-dream is vastly destructive. He lists the devastating environmental impacts of an even more mineral-intensive system based on renewables and warns: “The whole process of replacing a declining system with a more complex mining-based enterprise is now supposed to take place with a fragile banking system, dysfunctional democracies, broken supply chains, critical mineral shortages and hostile geopolitics.”
All of this assumes that global warming is real and anthropogenic. Not everyone agrees. In the article Global warming and the confrontation between the West and the rest of the world, journalist Thierry Meyssan argues that net zero is based on political ideology rather than science. But to state such things has become heresy in the Western countries and shouted down with accusations of ‘climate science denial’.
[The author conflates a real human-created climate crisis with efforts by the power structure to supposedly address it. See my comment. Nikiforuk by the way believes there is a real climate crisis.]
Fake green
The type of ‘green’ agenda being pushed is a multi-trillion market opportunity for lining the pockets of rich investors and subsidy-sucking green infrastructure firms and also part of a strategy required to secure compliance required for the ‘new normal’. It is, furthermore, a type of green that plans to cover much of the countryside with wind farms and solar panels with most farmers no longer farming. A recipe for food insecurity.
Those investing in the ‘green’ agenda care first and foremost about profit. The supremely influential BlackRock invests in the current food system that is responsible for polluted waterways, degraded soils, the displacement of smallholder farmers, a spiralling public health crisis, malnutrition and much more. It also invests in healthcare — an industry that thrives on the illnesses and conditions created by eating the substandard food that the current system produces. Did Larry Fink, the top man at BlackRock, suddenly develop a conscience and become an environmentalist who cares about the planet and ordinary people? Of course not…...
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Mar 12, 2024 6:24 PM [UT]
“All of this assumes that global warming is real and anthropogenic. Not everyone agrees. In the article Global warming and the Confrontation between the West and the Rest of the World. journalist Thierry Meyssan argues that net zero is based on political ideology rather than science.”
Thiery Meyssan has zero background in climate scinece. And there is an assumption that anyone who thinks global warming is real and anthropogenic supports net zero, which is absolute BS. Here is one example to the contrary.
Epic Tomorrows meets Just Collapse: Overshoot, #TalkCollapse & Insurgent Planning, Epic Tomorrows, December 2023.