[Image from Planet Waves]
Special Edition of Lockdown Times. This contains the core segment of Planet Waves weekly show broadcast yesterday, all about the Avian Flu hype in the context of the latest statement from Dr Mike Yeadon about respiratory viruses, included in yesterday’s edition of LT. From the main page of yesterday’s show, "Cindy Ragusa, Jeff Strahl, Chris McGregor and Christine Massey all contributed to tonight’s edition.”
Man on Bus Evaluates Missing Virus Problem. Dr. Michael Yeadon, retired Big Pharma exec & Pfizer chief scientist for respiratory, agrees that there's an issue showing existence of viruses. You will not kill grandma by breathing. Eric Francis Coppolino, 4/27/24.
[Audio file, 41 minutes]
I’m also securely of the opinion that global pandemics of severe illnesses are impossible. There haven’t been any pandemics. The most famous example, Spanish Flu pandemic, is a mixture of exaggeration and probable, deliberate poisoning.
By Dr. Michael Yeadon, April 25, 2024
Dear World*:
I’m formally confident that acute respiratory illnesses that we call colds and flu (“influenza-like illnesses”) are not caused by submicroscopic infectious particles called viruses & are not contagious.
For a number of other diseases which are attributed to viruses, such as “HIV/AIDS” & “Polio”, I’ve followed the trail of evidence far enough to also state that there is no evidence that they’re caused by such viruses. On the contrary, and like “Covid-19”, they are more correctly termed syndromes (since the claimed symptoms vary to an extraordinary extent) and are misattributions of a collection of other illnesses. In each case, people really are ill. It’s just that the diagnosis is wrong and not viral, either.
I’ve read of the failures ever to meet reasonable isolation expectations for any virus. Speaking as a man on the Clapham omnibus, I have learned enough to say I think viroLIEgy is wholly fraudulent. Speaking as Dr Mike Yeadon, PhD, I haven’t done enough personal, detailed research to be sure that viruses don’t exist, though I suspect that it’s true.
I make the distinction because I think people have a right to know whether I’m speaking as an experienced scientist or as a thoughtful but inexpert person. If I make a claim without qualification, it would be reasonable for a 3rd party to expect me to be able to produce chapter & verse on numerous important claims about allegedly viral illnesses and, in many cases, I couldn’t do that. I’d be relying on others testimony. I do have the evidence & have read primary literature on respiratory illnesses and selected others. That’s why I’m sure about them.
I’m also securely of the opinion that global pandemics of severe illnesses are impossible. There haven’t been any pandemics. The most famous example, Spanish Flu Pandemic, is a mixture of exaggeration and probable, deliberate poisoning. In recent years, they’re “PCR false positive pseudo epidemics”, a well-established, real thing, in which 100% of the claimed positive test results are false. There have been famous examples where this is entirely accidental, such as the whooping cough pseudo epidemic.
That we’re at risk at any moment of emergence of a pandemic or severe, highly infectious disease is a central lie which I now regard as an obvious untruth. It’s been a strange and bumpy journey.
The strangest thing is showing clever people the evidence underwriting my current position on acute respiratory illnesses & finding them unmoved by it. There have been some who’ve travelled along similar roads to the same conclusions. I believe Dr Jonathan Engler is one. There are numerous other people who I believe are sincere, so I’m not going tomorrow pick on them, yet still speak as if the propaganda of a lifetime remains intact. It’s maddening & I am unable to account for that.
Interestingly, one person, years ago, confessed to me that they didn’t want to believe what I was telling them, because it was simply too frightening. It’s possible that psychological protection mechanisms prevents some of us from accepting new information. I think we are much more subconsciously active beings than we realise. We then rationalise consciously those things our subconscious has processed (or not).
This may be why many of us have found it impossible to persuade others, even those we love & have known for many years, that we’re being lied to & are under extraordinary attack. I’m not a psychologist either, so I’m unsure what’s really going on when I failed to convince my older sister, who has a PhD in a biological field, that the pandemic is a long planned fraud.
There are some people who act as if they believe that all we need to do is assert that viruses don’t exist and the scales will fall from humanity’s eyes and the battle will be over. My own empirical evidence is that this is among the least successful ways of approaching the undoubtedly thick layers of infectious diseases.
Holding this opinion prompts some of them to claim I’m working for the perpetrators. I cannot help that. I think this is pretty much where my thinking is at present. For avoidance of doubt, both PCR based diagnostics, and tests for what are claimed to be antibodies to certain infectious disease causing agents, and vaccines (without reservation) are all fraudulent. The underlying illnesses are real, which is why the lies are so effective.
Best wishes, Mike
*The editor has added the salutation. Please note the British spellings in this letter. Unlike me, Michael can type and spell accurately. Previous essay from March 2023 is posted below.
Pfizer's former chief scientist Mike Yeadon: Why I don’t believe there ever was a 'covid’ virus, Eric F Coppolino, March 22, 2023[ [Graphic, link]
My comment, posted just now,
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 11:42AM, 4/27/24, US Pacific Time.
Copying my comment from the main page of yesterday's show.
An absolutely SUPER-SUPERB segment about the alleged avian flu. FWIW, Christine Massey's post about it from the 9th wasn't just a re-posting of the 2022 piece, as it was substantially updated, though the conclusion is the same, indeed firmed up.
And thanks for the mentioning of me as the source via which you heard about the Yeadon statement. I heard of it via Christine. This time, he minces no words. Again, FWIW, he didn't write it on the Lioness of Judah Substack, but on his Telegram channel. https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/ The Substack simply re-posted it.
My only difference with the statement is the use of the "viruses don't exist" language. As i've stated before, i MUCH prefer to say "viruses have not been proven to exist." A negative cannot be proven. Think otherwise? Prove that there are no two-headed feline species. And, even more importantly, the burden of proof should rest upon those who contend they do exist, that's how science should work.
Once again, the presence of segments of computer code in a person's bodily fluids are deemed to be indicative of an infection by a specific pathogen. Never mind that those segments were never demonstrated to be associated with any pathogen, merely declared to be parts of one based upon a genome never actually observed in any living entity, existing only as a construct made up of assembled computer code, existing only in a file, said to closely match... other computer files. Only a very minute step from here to having our contrived digital twins being used to represent us as legal persona.
Jon Rappoport was surmising that AI could be expected to be granted legal status and rights as a person.
(This in relation to your digital twin comment.)