[Graphic via Edward Slavsquat Substack, source is https://forumvostok.ru/en/ ]
Biomedical. The first item, by Riley Waggaman, has a bunch on preps for “future pandemics.", but also crosses over into 4IR.
But first you'll need to take a PCR test (obviously). Edward Slavsquat, 9/5/24.
What would you pay for the privilege of sitting in a room full of incorrigible lunatics as they spewed awe-inspiring gibberish in defense of the global oligarchy and its ongoing plans to make life thoroughly intolerable? If your answer to this tempting question is “$6,768 and that’s my final offer—not a penny more, not a penny less,” then you need to hustle to Vladivostok, because the Eastern Economic Forum ENDS TOMORROW. You’ve already missed “Disease X: How Can We Prepare for the Unknown?” and many other delightfully soul-crushing panel discussions.
This is a forum that you simply can’t afford to miss unless you also plan to be at the G20, Davos, or Bohemian Grove—because the exact same topics will be discussed at these conferences as well. As per tradition, you will need to take a PCR test to participate in this year’s Eastern Economic festivities. Actually, you will need to take two not-fit-for-purpose scam-tests if you want to listen to Vladimir Putin talk about Eastern Economic things. Better safe than sorry.[Screen shot with information about the testing]
(The extra PCR test for Putin might make some readers a tad bit uneasy—but have no fear! Some time ago your correspondent wrote a four-part blog-report, “Putin & COVID”, detailing the Russian president’s top secret shadow war against the WHO and Big Pharma. Please read this important series (Part I, II, III, IV) to better understand that this additional Eastern Economic PCR test is part of Putin’s cunning plan to send Bill Gates to a penal colony in Siberia before he is recruited by Russia’s MOD to sit in a trench in East Ukraine until he is killed by a suicide drone.)
Trust the plan. Anyway. Assuming you are PCR-Negative, you will have access to a Business Program jam-packed with Multipolar Eastern Wisdom:
Russia and China: Working Together towards Carbon Neutrality by 2060
"Russia and China are among the world’s top five largest greenhouse gas emitters, and the success of their efforts to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 will largely determine the extent to which the goals of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement will be achieved. China has a national greenhouse gas emissions trading system, while Russia has introduced mandatory carbon reporting and is conducting an emissions trading experiment on Sakhalin island. The two countries are trying to find the most effective regulatory solutions that will help to achieve comprehensive decarbonization taking into account their own specific national circumstances, while also continuing to implement economic growth and development plans. Given the growing rate of carbon regulation, Russian and Chinese companies have a great opportunity to build cooperation in supplying resources and exchanging technology, which are crucial to implementing the ambitious climate goals. What challenges and opportunities does cooperation in low-carbon development create for companies? Could carbon regulation be used to increase competitiveness and penetrate new markets? How can we ensure the mutual recognition and comparability of measures and efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?"
BONUS: The moderator of this titillating panel discussion is the CEO of Russia’s National ESG-Alliance—a shameless grift spearheaded by Russia’s friendliest bank, Sber.[Screen shot]
I know what some of you are thinking: Carbon neutrality is great, but is the Multipolar World Order ready to support the WHO when it declares another fake pandemic, murdering hundreds of millions of people in the process? EEF-2024 will alleviate your very valid concerns.
Disease X. How Can We Prepare for the Unknown?
"We can only talk hypothetically about how dangerous, contagious, or lethal Disease X might be in the future. However, it is highly likely that a new pathogen with pandemic potential will emerge in Southeast Asia. Given the population density, urbanization, degree of economic integration, rapidly growing interrelations, and pace of trade and economic development, the countries in the region need to create new opportunities for cooperation in epidemic risk management, the early detection and suppression of new infections, as well as research and development in terms of diagnostics and vaccines. How Southeast Asia ends up preparing for Disease X will dictate whether a new pandemic will be more destructive than COVID-19. Is the threat of a new unknown Disease X real? When can we expect it and what will contribute to its emergence? What do we need to do to prevent the emergence of a new pandemic? Is Southeast Asia ready for the next pandemic? Will it be able to protect the world and prevent the spread of a potential disease? What priorities exist for scientific and technical cooperation among countries in the region to improve their readiness for infectious threats? What cooperation mechanisms need to be strengthened and developed to improve preparedness and respond to pandemics?"
BONUS: The panel’s moderator, Vyacheslav Smolensky, is a high-ranking Russian WHO bootlicker who studied in London. Coincidence or fate?[Screen shot]
Moving on. Adaptation to Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities for Business
"Long-term observations indicate that the average annual temperature on the Earth’s surface in Russia has been growing by an average of 0.51 °C every 10 years since the mid-1970s (the temperature growth rate has increased by 0.04 °C compared with 2019), which is 2.8 times higher than the average growth rate in global temperatures (0.18 °C every 10 years). The growth rate in Russia’s Arctic zone is 3.9 times higher than the average global rate (0.71 °C every 10 years). The adaptation process involves adjusting to actual or expected climate change and its consequences in manmade and natural systems in order to reduce harm or take advantage of favourable opportunities. Is Russian business ready to integrate adaptation principles into their economic activities, and how would this affect such business processes as risk management and long-term planning? Is it better to deal with such issues today or is this an additional burden on business?"
BONUS: Moderated by Sberbank’s Senior Vice President for ESG. Because the East does things differently than the West.
More on that:. A New Climate Order
"The UN Summit of the Future needs to outline the main focuses for the organization’s development for the period after 2030. At the Summit, world leaders will approve the Pact for the Future, which demonstrates global solidarity in the interests of present and future generations. One of the main components of this document will be the climate agenda. The next Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change will take place in Baku in November 2024. One of the main objectives will be to set a collective quantifiable target for financing. The presidencies troika, which includes the United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, and Brazil, is preparing a roadmap that aims to significantly expand international cooperation and stimulate countries to be more ambitious in their contributions at the national level to step up their actions to contain global warming. What climate agenda issues will be considered at the UN Summit of the Future? What will be the key themes at the upcoming climate conference in Baku? What kind of objectives will be set in the run-up to the anniversary COP, which will take place in Brazil in 2025?"
To summarize, this is the Multipolar World that we are all looking forward to. Southeast Asia in a Multipolar World
"In today’s world, where globalization and integration are becoming increasingly significant factors in the development of society, special attention is paid to regions that play a key role in the formation of the new world order. The Asia-Pacific has become a new centre of politics and economics, playing a key role in the modern geopolitical system. And no one can deny that the centre of global development has shifted to this region. Southeast Asia is a critical region for global politics, where complex political processes are unfolding, including territorial disputes and changing balances of power between various countries. How does the changing balance of power in the Asia-Pacific affect the global geopolitical situation? What external forces influence political processes in the Asia-Pacfic? How might the process of decoupling that is taking place between the United States and China change global political and economic relations? What are NATO’s interests in the Asia-Pacific in the context of the U.S.–China rivalry? Could Southeast Asia become the new global financial centre?"
Moderator: Alexander Dugin. Not a joke. Honestly this is getting tiresome.
THE EDWARD INSTITUTE FOR VILLAGE STUDIES WASN’T EVEN INVITED TO THIS HISTORIC ANTI-GLOBALIST CONFERENCE. WHY WHY WHY TELL SUSAN WHY.
My comment at the page,
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 9/5/24.
Thanks, Riley. Great to see you post a full report again!
Disease X, Mpox, Avian Flu, new "COVID" variants, Polio, ..... the threats are endless, and we must be prepared to face this brave new world. ( :-)) Yes, please, test me, test me, just please don't arrest me.
And hail the new multipolar world order. Scott Ritter a week or so ago spoke glowingly of it as bringing a new era of global peace and prosperity, on a You Tube video, after assuring the host that Russia will be done with Ukraine by month's end.
One thing: climate chaos is real, but what the ruling elite propose to do about it has nothing to do with dealing with it, as it's all about taking advantage of it to centralize and magnify state power on behalf of the ruling elite's 4IR program, just like with 9/11, and with 3/11(2020).
And, following up on the previous edition’s (9/4/24) item regarding the polio outbreak and ‘immunization” drive in Gaza, a re=posting of an item from two years ago about the history of polio, virology, the AMA and the Rockefeller interests.
Toxicology vs Virology: Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud, F. William Engdahl, 7/12/22/
One of the outcomes of the alleged new SARS Covid virus that publicly emerged in 2019 is that the medical specialization of virology has been raised to a stature almost Godlike in the media. Few understand the origins of virology and its elevation into a leading role in today’s medicine practice. For this we need to look at the origins and politics of America’s first medical research institute, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, today Rockefeller University, and their work on what they claimed was a polio virus.
In 1907 an outbreak of a sickness in New York City gave the director of the Rockefeller Institute, Simon Flexner, MD, a golden opportunity to lay claim to discovery of an invisible “virus” caused by what was arbitrarily called poliomyelitis. The word poliomyelitis simply means inflammation of the spinal cord’s grey matter. There were some 2,500 New Yorkers, mostly children, designated with some form of poliomyelitis, including paralysis and even death, that year.
Flexner’s Fraud
The most striking aspect of the entire polio saga in the USA during the first half of the 20th Century was the fact that every key phase of the business was controlled by people tied to what became the Rockefeller medical cabal. This fraud started with claims by the Director of the Rockefeller Institute, Simon Flexner, that he and his colleague, Paul A. Lewis, had “isolated” a pathogen, invisible to the eye, smaller even than bacteria, which they claimed caused the paralyzing sickness in a series of outbreaks in the US. How did they come to this idea?
In a paper published in 1909 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Flexner claimed he and Lewis had isolated the poliomyelitis virus responsible. He reported they had successfully “passaged” poliomyelitis through several monkeys, from monkey to monkey. They began by injecting diseased human spinal cord tissue of a young boy who had died, presumably from the virus, into the brains of monkeys. After a monkey fell ill, a suspension of its diseased spinal cord tissue was injected into the brains of other monkeys who also fell ill.
They proclaimed that the Rockefeller Institute doctors had thus proven poliomyelitis virus causality for the mysterious disease. They hadn’t done anything of the sort. Flexner and Lewis even admitted that: “We failed utterly to discover bacteria, either in film preparations or in cultures, that could account for the disease; and, since among our long series of propagations of the virus in monkeys not one animal showed, in the lesions, the cocci described by some previous investigators, and we had failed to obtain any such bacteria from the human material studied by us, we felt that they could be excluded from consideration.” What they then did was to make a bizarre supposition, a leap of faith, not a scientific claim. They took their hypothesis of viral exogenous agency and made it fact, with no proof whatever. They asserted: “Therefore, …the infecting agent of epidemic poliomyelitis belongs to the class of the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.“ Therefore?
Simon Flexner simply asserted it “must” be a polio virus killing the monkeys, because they could find no other explanation. In fact he did not look for another source of the illnesses. This was not scientific isolation. It was wild speculation: “…not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.” They admitted this in a December 18, 1909 follow up in JAMA, titled, THE NATURE OF THE VIRUS OF EPIDEMIC POLIOMYELITIS.
The so-called “virus” they were injecting into monkeys was hardly pure. It also contained an undetermined amount of contaminants. It included “pureed spinal cord, brain, fecal matter, even flies were ground up and injected into monkeys to induce paralysis.” Until Jonas Salk won approval from the US Government in April 1955 for a polio vaccine, no scientific proof of existence of a virus causing poliomyelitis, or infantile paralysis as it was commonly known, had been proven. That is the case to this day. The medical world all took Flexner’s word that it “must” be a virus.
Rockefeller Institute, Flexner and the American Medical Association
The Rockefeller Institute was founded from the Standard Oil fortune of John D. Rockefeller in 1901, to be America’s first biomedical institute. It was modelled on France’s Pasteur Institute (1888) and Germany’s Robert Koch Institute (1891). Its first Director, Simon Flexner, played a pivotal and most criminal role in the evolution of what became approved American medical practice. The Rockefeller goal was to completely control American medical practice and transform it into an instrument, at least initially, for promotion of medical drugs approved by the Rockefeller interests. By then they were looking to monopolize medical drugs produced from their petroleum refining, as they had done with oil.
As Rockefeller Institute head, Simon Flexner, was publishing his inconclusive but highly acclaimed studies on polio, he arranged for his brother, Abraham Flexner, a school teacher with no medical background, to head a joint study by the American Medical Association (AMA), the Rockefeller General Education Board, and the Carnegie Foundation founded by Rockefeller’s close friend Andrew Carnegie.
The 1910 study was titled, The Flexner Report, and its ostensible purpose was to investigate the quality of all US medical schools. The outcome of the report was, however, predetermined. Ties between the well-endowed Rockefeller Institute and the AMA went through the corrupt AMA head, George H. Simmons.
Simmons was also the editor of the influential Journal of the American Medical Association, a publication delivered to some 80,000 doctors across America. He reportedly wielded absolute power over the doctors’ association. He controlled the rising ad revenues for drug companies to promote their drugs to AMA doctors in his journal, a highly lucrative business. He was a key part of the Rockefeller medical coup that was to completely redefine acceptable medical practice away from remedial or preventive treatment to use of often deadly drugs and expensive surgeries. As head of the AMA Simmons realized that the competition from a proliferation of medical schools, including then-recognized chiropractic, osteopathy, homeopathy and natural medicine, was lessening income of his AMA doctors, as the number of medical schools had increased from around 90 in 1880 to over 150 in 1903.
Abraham Flexner, former headmaster of a private school, toured various US medical schools in 1909 and recommended that fully half of the 165 medical schools be closed, as what he defined as “sub-standard.” This reduced competition from other approaches to healing diseases. They ruthlessly targeted then-widespread naturopathic medical schools, chiropractic ones, osteopaths as well as independent allopathic schools unwilling to join the AMA regime. Then Rockefeller money went to the select schools with a proviso that professors be vetted by the Rockefeller Institute and the curriculum focus on drugs and surgery as treatment, not prevention, nor nutrition, nor toxicology as possible causes and solutions. They had to accept Pasteur’s germ theory of disease, which claims one germ to one disease reductionism. Rockefeller-controlled media launched a coordinated witch-hunt against all forms of alternative medicine, herbal remedies, natural vitamins and chiropractic–anything not controlled by Rockefeller patented drugs.
By 1919 the Rockefeller General Education Board and the Rockefeller Foundation had paid out more than $5,000,000 to Johns Hopkins, Yale and Washington University in St. Louis medical schools. In 1919 John D. Rockefeller granted another $20,000,000 in securities, “for the advancement of medical education in the United States.” That would be comparable to about $340 million today, a huge sum. In short the Rockefeller money interests had hijacked American medical education and medical research by the 1920’s.
Creating Virology
This medical takeover, backed by the most influential doctors’ organization, the AMA, and its corrupt head, Simmons, allowed Simon Flexner to literally create modern virology under Rockefeller rules. The highly controversial Thomas Milton Rivers, as director of The Rockefeller Institute’s virology laboratory, established virology as an independent field, separate from bacteriology, during the 1920s. They realized they could manipulate far easier when they could claim deadly pathogens that were invisible germs or “viruses.” Ironically virus comes from Latin for poison.
Virology, a reductionist medical fraud, was a creation of the Rockefeller medical cabal. That highly important fact is buried in the annals of medicine today. Diseases such as smallpox or measles or poliomyelitis were declared caused by invisible pathogens called specific viruses. If scientists could “isolate” the invisible virus, theoretically they could find vaccines to protect people from harm. So their theory went. It was a huge boon for the Rockefeller cartel of pharmaceutical companies, which at the time included American Home Products which falsely promoted drugs with no proof of effect, such as Preparation H for Hemorrhoids, or Advil for pain relief; Sterling Drug,which took over the US assets including Aspirin of German Bayer AG after World War I; Winthrop Chemical; American Cyanamid and its subsidiary Lederle Laboratories; Squibb and Monsanto.
Soon virus researchers at the Rockefeller Institute, in addition to claiming discovery of the poliomyelitis virus, claimed to discover the viruses that caused smallpox, mumps, measles and yellow fever. Then they announced “discovery” of preventive vaccines for pneumonia and yellow fever. All of these “discoveries” announced by the Institute proved false. With the control of the research in the new area of virology, the Rockefeller Institute, in collusion with Simmons at AMA and his equally corrupt successor, Morris Fishbein, could promote new patented vaccines or drug “remedies” in the influential AMA journal that went to every member doctor in America. Drug companies refusing to pay for ads in the AMA journal were blackballed by the AMA. [SNIP]……..
4IR. Elon Mush postures as a defender of free speech, and so many “health freedom” movement people are falling for it.
Quick Take: Elon Musk vs Brazil more fake “free speech” theatre. Kit Knightly, 9/3/24.
Recently we were asked on Twitter to comment on the Elon Musk/Brazil situation. At the time we didn’t really see the point, coming so hot on the heels of our previous piece on the current “free speech” psyop:[Tweet]
But the story hasn’t gone away, so here is our quick take on it in nine little words: This is exactly the situation we were talking about. Here’s a quick summary of the story so far, for those not paying attention:
• A Brazilian judge ordered Musk/X to shut down seven anti-government accounts for, among other things, questioning the fairness of the recent Presidential Election.
• Musk refused, shutting down X’s Brazil office in the bargain.
• The Brazilian government has now banned X altogether.
There’s drama and court cases and “leaked documents” and seized assets as well (with more to come I’m sure), but that’s the gist, and it fits perfectly into the model we described: The battle lines are drawn up and either you’re with the government or you’re with Elon Musk. An entirely fake a war between overt censorship and covert censorship.
Elon Musk is routinely described as a “free speech absolutist”, however his platform is anything but. His position is that Twitter/X will follow the speech laws of the countries in which it operates. Meaning, if you live in the UK and Keir Starmer suddenly decides to ban talking about cheese, well then say goodbye to your at-cheeseisgrate fan account. Musk isn’t a free speech absolutist, he’s a free speech lawful neutral. The worst alignment.
Meanwhile, the “liberal” left is so thoroughly conditioned to cheer when Trump boos and hiss when Musk claps, that they happily take the side of government censorship, banning apps and jail time for “bad words”. Again. So you get repulsive articles like this.[Link]
The “debate” is so far gone that neither side is anywhere close to free speech anymore. While true free speech is under a sustained propaganda assault. …this is exactly the same fake split narrative control device that permeates every political discussion.
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Sep 5, 2024 5:59 PM [UT]
The liberal left reacts knee jerk, and most “freedom” folks do so in their own way, grabbing onto Elon as if he’s a free speech champion and always has been, just like they’re flocking Trump’s way/ Yep, the guy who launched Operation Warp Speed.
Ending this segment and this edition, the IDF kills a US citizen in the West Bank. Can you imagine the US government reacting so laid-back to such a killing if Palestinians had been responsible?
Israeli forces kill American-Turkish activist in the occupied West Bank. Twenty-six-year-old Aysenur Ezgi Eygi is shot in the head during a protest against illegal Israeli settlements. 9/6/24.
Israeli forces have fatally shot an American-Turkish activist at a demonstration in the occupied West Bank, the Palestinian news agency Wafa and a hospital official say. Twenty-six-year-old Aysenur Ezgi Eygi was taking part in the protest against illegal Israeli settlements on Mount Sbeih in Beita, south of Nablus, on Friday when she was shot.
Fouad Nafaa, the head of the Rafidia Hospital in Nablus, told the news agency Reuters that Ezgi Eygi arrived at the hospital in a critical condition with a serious head injury. “We tried to perform a resuscitation operation on her, but unfortunately, she died,” he said. Ezgi Eygi was shot when Israeli forces fired live ammunition, stun grenades and tear gas at demonstrators, Wafa reported, quoting local sources. Jonathan Pollak, a witness, told Al Jazeera he found Ezgi Eygi “lying on the ground beneath an olive grove, bleeding to death.”…….
US Department of State spokesman Matthew Miller said the US was “urgently gathering more information” and “will have more to say as we learn more”. The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement in which it said by killing its citizen, “Israel is trying to intimidate all those who come to the aid of the Palestinian people and who fight peacefully against the genocide. This policy of violence will not work.” “The Israeli authorities who commit crimes against humanity and those who unconditionally support them will be held accountable before international courts,” the statement read.
Ezgi Eygi was part of the International Solidarity Movement, which describes itself as a Palestinian-led movement “committed to resisting the long-entrenched and systematic oppression and dispossession of the Palestinian population, using nonviolent, direct-action methods and principles”. She was demonstrating against Israeli settler violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, which has spiked since Israel’s war on Gaza began in October.
The vast majority of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal, and US President Joe Biden’s administration says the settlements are “inconsistent with international law”. But the US has provided diplomatic cover for Israel over the years with Washington consistently using its veto power in the United Nations Security Council to protect Israel from diplomatic censure.
Thanks Jeff for your diligent attention to these issues.