The first two items are a crossover involving both Biomedical as well as 4IR.
Dr Sam Bailey has turned an excellent essay by Paul Cudunec about 4IR, including the “Pandemic” Operation, into a video.
Dr Sam Bailey, 9/24/24.
[Embedded video, 16 minutes]
"In writing about 'pandemics' we are well aware that they need to be considered within a wider global context. In 2021, Mark and co-author Dr John Bevan-Smith wrote in The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity, 'this assault on humanity relies on a Trojan horse to deliver the fraud into our minds and bodies, making possible the fulfillment of the globalist agenda of a population control grid with the apparent ultimate aim of controlling populations in every way possible.’" - Drs Mark & Samantha Bailey, The Final Pandemic
Paul Cudenec is a journalist, essayist and novelist who founded the Winter Oak website. With a long-term background in the English anarchist movement, he has become known since 2020 as a critic of the Great Reset agenda. While we have been busy exposing the foundational scientific fraud behind the COVID-19 event, Paul has been prolific in writing about how the fraud is being used to accelerate the despicable plans of a global criminocracy. We were privileged to become much more familiar with his work in the COVID-era through W.D. James, another Winter Oak contributor and author of "The Mortal God Drops Its Mask".
This is a special video presentation of one of Paul's essays "The corruption is real and sickening", first published in September 2024. [This essay was posted in The Acorn, #96, posted 9/2/24, fell through the cracks in my notifications, i will go back and post parts of it in a future edition.] It is punchy and powerful but might be hard to swallow for those who believe they are being helped by Big Pharma, as well as global financiers, such as the Rothschilds and their friends. As Paul warns, this information may be too much for people whose, "scientifically-sealed minds cannot even grasp the possibility that others might have taken the initiative to have a peek backstage and work out what ‘The Spectacle’ is all about."
Show notes and related videos HERE [Link] Please note comments and the associated thread will be removed if they are off-topic or disrepectful to other people.
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 9/24/24
Thanks, Dr Sam Bailey, for bringing us this excellent expose. I also recommend the 1980 book "Trilaterialism" by Holly Sklar which exposes the role that the Trilateral Commission was already playing in shaping a coming global order.
Paul's a good person. I do wish he'd open up about the virus matter, he has resisted.
And, Eric Francis Coppolino situates the on-going Israeli massacres in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon in the context of the 4IR, of which the “COVID” PsyOp has been a key part of over the last four years.
A look at the well-established Israeli independence chart, and its transits, plus a refresher on the 10/7 Tel Aviv false flag incident chart — and the "Great Reset" connection. Eric Francis Coppolino, 9/25/24.
[Embedded audio file, 43 minutes[
Good afternoon from New York — While this post claims to be astrologically focused, I eventually get there. With help from Jeff Strahl of Lockdown Times, I think I figured out what's happening re Israel's psychotic pattern of aggression: it's the latest front in World War Digital, a/k/a The Great Reset a/k/a the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which we first met as "covid." Israel is the figure; the takeover of consciousness by The Robot is the deeper ground. Then after looking at this issue, eventually I get into the astrology, which is a set of metaphorical references that provide details into the timing and themes. Astrology, too, is ground: the invisible environment, which, once perceived, helps reveal the underlying nature of the situation. — efc -
Eric F Coppolino
Good Morning from New York:
Top line, bottom line: The situation in West Asia (the “Middle East”) looks like the latest front in what’s called the Great Reset (that started as “covid”), a/k/a the 4th Industrial Revolution (digital takeover of existence) and Agenda 2030 (same thing). Shorthand for this is 4IR, in case you’re wondering what this term means. Basically, it’s about total submission of humanity to The Robot. Literary reference to The Borg episode of Star Trek Next Generation.
In effect, we are experiencing World War Digital. In this STARCAST, I do my best to tie together these issues with the astrology. It’s not a stretch. Events in Aries and Aquarius have been sending all manner of warnings about the digital issue for quite a while. If you’re curious about the personal implications, here is the Cancer annual reading for 2021, called The Great Reconciliation of Accounts and of Reality.
Not the best. The only.The 2025 annual reading is now available for pre-sale.
Background materials for this program —[Links]
Iran’s President Speaks at UN About Avoiding Full Scale Regional War
Israel Demolishes Civilian Infrastructure in the West Bank
Additional reporting by Jeff Strahl
More from Jeff at Lockdown Times
When I say the 2020 crisis was driven by AI, including a “metagenomic sequence,” you can find out more by reading my chronology, or at least the introductory materials. This is true of all the “epidemics” being sold this week.
My comment. The note of mine Eric reads from, which he has posted in comments, wasn’t itself intended for a wider audience, but this morning i turned it into an item via editing and adding stuff, and i sent it out earlier today as Special Edition.Look for it at this page or your email box.
4IR. Andy Steele of AE911Truth interviewed Madhava Setty, a doctor who has gotten involved in 9/11 Truth and has published a book about his own experience grokking what actually happened. Setty briefly mentions the Biomedical hoax of the last 4 years.
AE911Truth, 9/23/24, 35 minutes.
The author of Woke: An Anesthesiologist's View admits he is a relative newcomer to the 9/11 Truth Movement. During his 24th Hour interview with Andy Steele, Madhava Setty said his awakening came when he first saw the collapse of WTC Building 7 in 2017 and then read the official report from NIST. “Their report proved their own hypothesis wrong.”
During the interview, Setty described how difficult it is to prove to scientists that an official claim is false when they are unwilling to listen – or when they are corrupt. “If this was a rational world, the truth about 9/11 would be out there in full view, but we don’t have a rational world,” he said. “And the people we would expect would be the most rational – the ones with letters after their names – are the ones that are the most irrational.”
And, in news from Southwest Asia, the US military’s home page is reporting of new US military deployments to the region. These include the aircraft carrier Harry S Truman, s cruiser and 2 destroyers. There are already 40,000 US military personnel in the area. See here.
And, Electronic Intifada’s weekly news program is up.
Breaking news and analysis on day 355 of Gaza's Al-Aqsa Flood | The Electronic Intifada Podcast, 9/25/24.Two hours and 49 minutes.
00:00 Introduction
01:49 Nora Barrows-Friedman delivers the news report
19:30 Yousef Aljamal talks about Refaat Alareer's legacy and the forthcoming book, "If I Must Die: Poetry and Prose," an anthology of Refaat’s writing about teaching, literature, politics and family
01:01:34 Jon Elmer focuses on the latest from the battles in Gaza and the expanding war between Hizballah and Israel
01:50:53 Group discussion on Israel's stated war goals
02:06:04 Ali Abunimah analyzes Israel's Iron Dome capacity and war of attrition
02:20:35 Group discussion on Axis of Resistance
Ending this segment and this edition, Iain Davis looks at how the entire anti-immigrant movement in the US and Europe is a diversion from the real enemy, the 4IR that’s being rolled out.
Sutherland, Kalergi, Camus, Replacism and Technocracy. Iain Davis, 9/24/24. A few segments.
In the UK, the so-called far-right‘s stance on immigration is said to be driven by “the Great Replacement conspiracy theory.” According to the influential global think tank the Institute for Strategic Studies (ISD):
“The Great Replacement” theory was first coined by French writer Renaud Camus. Identitarian movements across Europe (including in Austria, the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, France and Germany) have used the theory to recruit others to their cause, claiming their countries and national “identities” are under threat due to increasing immigrant populations."
It is true, in part, that Camus made this argument. Some elements of his philosophy are racist and do offer apparent rationales for religious bigotry. It is also true that Camus has been influential in the rise of the identitarian movement, which is perceived as “right-wing.” Identitarianism broadly stands in opposition to identitiy politics, considered progressive or “left-wing.”
While the identitarian movement generally opposes multiculturalism and defends ethno-culturalism, identity politics largely holds that states foist structural inequality of opportunity upon people based on their personal characteristics—such as their ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation and disability, etc. Those who oppose multiculturalism perceive identity politics as a deliberate attempt to dilute or even eradicate their culture. These sociopolitical and philosophical concepts have a massive “influence” on our polity, public discourse and society. The right vs left paradigm is thereby created and perpetuated through the constantly reported clash between the identitarian movement and identity politics.
Those who espouse the Great Replacement theory often cite the comments of Peter Sutherland (1946 – 2018) as evidence that there is a cohesive “plan” to replace European culture. Sutherland was “influential” in guiding the development of the EU and the World Trade Organisation (WTO). He was a banker, business man, lawyer and politician. Sutherland sat on the Bilderberg steering committee, he was chairman of Trilateral Commission European division and the European Round Table movement.
Sutherland was part of what US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member David Rothkopf called the “Superclass.” In an on-stage discussion, held by the global think tank the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP), Rothkopf generously defined members of the alleged Superclass as “people who influence the lives of millions across borders on a regular basis.”
Rothkopf’s opinion is aligned with a branch of political science called “elite theory.” It generally argues that oligarchs—those who use their immense wealth to buy social and political “influence”—are beneficial for, or necessary to, the function of a healthy society. Numerous contrarian economists, philosophers, political theorists and scientists have argued the elite theorists’ assertions are abject nonsense.
In 2012, speaking in the UK House of Lords to the the European Union Home Affairs Health and Education inquiry on Global Approach to Migration and Mobility, Sutherland was asked by Lord Sharkey to explain why he viewed inward migration necessary. Sutherland was of the opinion that declining and ageing populations in Europe needed demographic stimulus, even if just from an economic perspective.
Sutherland answered: "So demographics are a key element of the debate, and a key argument for the development of—I hesitate to use the word because people have attacked it—multicultural states. It is impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the alternative argument can survive, because states have to become more open in terms of the people who inhabit them, as the United Kingdom has demonstrated."
Lord Judd noted that unemployment rates were particularly high across Europe—compared to the Americas and Oceania—among migrant populations. He Asked Sutherland why he thought that was the case and what the European Union proposed to do about it. Sutherland said: "[. . .] the United States or Australia and New Zealand are migrant societies and therefore accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others, which is precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine."
This prompted the BBC—among other legacy media outlets—to write “EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief.” In an extremely atypical moment, the BBC added that Sutherland “has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy.” Bilderberg meetings are not allegedly secretive. They use the Chatham House rule and are absolutely secretive.
While the BBC also explained Sutherland’s offered economic rationale, for the identitarian movement this was “proof” of the EU plan to eradicate their culture. The BBC’s very unusual mention of the Bilderberg group appeared to intentionally heighten these supposedly “far-right” fears……
Kalergi’ and Camus’ work has also been pounced upon by real far-right individuals and groups. To be honest, most of this owes more to their xenophobia and paranoia than it does to evidence or, indeed, any cogent analysis of either Kalergi or Camus. If we think about it, the Great Replacement, as espoused by a tiny number of far-right voices, doesn’t make much sense. By all socio-economic and political measures, it is the the migrant populations in most countries that are the poorest and and least able to exercise either social or political power. If multiculturalism is the “planned” replacement of the indigenous ethno-culture, as the fringe “far-right” claims, it has been a miserable failure.
It seems pretty obvious that real social and political oppression is exerted through the class system. People from all ethnic groups and religious denominations suffer inequality of opportunity, first and foremost, by virtue of their economic status and class. While UK governments consistently claim that social mobility is thriving in the UK, nearly every, more independent study suggests this is total claptrap:
"The [UK] is associated with particular immobility among those on low and high incomes. The education system as a whole has failed to function as the great social leveller. [. . .] A recurring finding is that the workplace is as at least as important as education in determining mobility prospects. [. . .] Large gaps by background remain in the likelihood of climbing the income ladder, ending up in a higher social class, or securing a university degree. In terms of absolute social mobility, the evidence suggests that a former golden age of upward mobility has been replaced by a modern era of declining opportunities and more limited upward mobility."
Returning to our topic: think tanks, like the ISD, and NGO’ “charities,” like HNH, also ignore most of Kalergi’s and Camus’s ideas. If they reference them at all, they tend only to highlight the treatise that appear to be racist or bigoted and ignore the rest…..
While the identitarian movement alleges the so-called “Kalergi Plan” is further evidence supporting its notion of ethno-cultural replacement, Kalergi—perhaps unknowingly—actually preempted the envisaged transition to a continental Technocracy.
Technocracy is the idea that Technates—instead of nation states—can be formed by splitting the “functions” of society into “special sequences” administered by “experts” or technocrats—instead of politicians—on a continental scale. The whole system can theoretically be centrally controlled through the management of a new monetary system based upon the distribution of the “energy certificates,” as required for each “function” of the Technate.
Technocracy became popular in the US during the Progressive Era (1901-1929). It was driven by the theory of using technology to improve efficiency, advocated by Frederick Winslow Taylor (Taylorism), and the resource allocation economic theories of economists like Thorstein Veblan (conspicuous consumption). Published less than a decade after Kalergi wrote Practical Idealism, the Technocracy Inc. Study Course formally introduced Technocracy to the world.
Instead of Kalergi’s “noblest men” forming a new “natural hierarchy of human perfection” Technocracy would supposedly see “natural peck-rights” awarded to those with the requisite technical skills and expertise. According to the technocrats, these chosen individuals would apparently emerge from “spontaneous natural priority.”
Like Kalergi, the technocrats thought a classless society was possible. It seems odd to believe societies dominated by a technocratic nobility could be called classless. But there are many bizarre contradictions found in Kalergi’s ideas and Technocracy. Nevertheless, both Kalergi and the technocrats recognised that “global technological transition” was key to fulfilment of their dreams.
More than three decades later, In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder alongside David Rockefeller of the Trilateral Commission—of which Peter Sutherland and Keir Starmer have been prominent members—wrote Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era. Brzezinski and the Trilateralists accelerated the transition to Technocracy.
In 2022, the Trilateral Commission listed the current UK prime minister as a former member. Though why they felt the need to list Starmer, who is supposedly not a member, on their official membership list is confusing to say the least. Technocracy appeals to the oligarch class—Rothkopf’s “Superclass”—because it is the most comprehensive system of social control ever devised. It utilises technology as a centrally managed tool for surveillance and behavioural control of the population.
As noted by Brzezinski: "Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control."
More recently, the Editor in Chief of the Lancet medical journal, Richard Horton, observed how the state response to Covid-19 appeared to have sped up the transition to Technocracy: "It would be hard to deny that scientists have assumed a role in political decision making unparalleled in recent memory. [. . .] Technocracy is replacing democracy. Technocratic governments are crisis governments. And most western democracies are in crisis and will remain in crisis for several years to come."
The World Economic Forum says these crises—pandemics, war and the energy, cost-of-living and climate crises, etc.—are converging to form an alleged “polycrisis.” In turn, according to the UN—a WEF “partner”—the only possible solution to the so-called polycrisis is global Technocracy:
"We do not know which extreme risk event will come next; it might be another pandemic, a new war, a high-consequence biological attack, a cyberattack on critical infrastructure, a nuclear event, a rapidly moving environmental disaster, or something completely different such as technological or scientific developments gone awry. [. . .] [T]o enable us to better anticipate and respond to such risks, it will be important for the United Nations to draw on a network of the best thinkers and data, externally and within the United Nations system, to present a Strategic Foresight and Global Risk Report to Member States every five years. [. . .] This would also be linked to corresponding governance arrangements for such risks, as appropriate, as well as the action needed to address them. [The UN proposes] to work with Member States to establish an Emergency Platform to respond to complex global crises. [. . .] It would be triggered automatically in crises of sufficient scale and magnitude, regardless of the type or nature of the crisis involved. Once activated, it would bring together leaders from Member States, the United Nations system, key country groupings, international financial institutions, regional bodies, civil society, the private sector, subject-specific industries or research bodies and other experts."
Polycrisis preparedness will be overseen by “a network” of technocrats who will devise the necessary “governance arrangements” and decree what “actions” government need to take. Centralised global control of government policy, in other words.
Via the diktat of the UN’s public-private global governance system, anything could be declared a global crisis. Once announced, the Emergency Platform will be “triggered automatically” and global technocratic control will be handed over to a global public-private partnership comprised of a few senior politicians, international NGO’s, global financial institutions, multinational corporations—including the banks—and “other experts.”….
For the global public-private partnership, coalescing around the global governance systems of the UN, that seeks to use “nocence” to facilitate the “replacism” necessary for Technocracy, the racist bigotry of the genuine “far-right” is a gift. It is certainly in their interests to promote the so-called far-right threat.
For example, in 1993 CFR member Samual P. Huntington published his article in the CFR’s in-house magazine Foreign Affairs titled The Clash of Civilisations. Huntington claimed that Islam presented an existential threat to Western civilisation and argued that “The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural.” Clearly, this is an argument supported by the “far-right.” It is precisely what people like Tommy Robinson claim to be the most pressing social problem of our time.
Writing for the Trilateral Commission in 1975, Huntington co-wrote The Crisis of Democracy: On the Governability of Democracies. In it, the Trilateralists argued that power is diminished by what they called an “excess of democracy” and that “the prestige and authority of central government institutions” must be restored. These sought-after sociopolitical conditions are inherent to Technocracy.
Unlike Camus’ theories or Kalergi’s ideas, Huntington’s opinions are not attacked as “far-right.” By casting any and all opposition to nocence-based policy initiatives as “far-right extremism,” the so-called “Superclass” creates a fake moral argument that can be used to censor, marginalise, and cancel all criticisms of the global Technocracy they are installing.
Perhaps more crucially, by perpetuating the left-right paradigm, pitting the identitarian movement against the advocates of identity politics, populations can be mired in pointless debates. This irrelevant distraction, embodied by the vacuum of party politics, leaves the global public-private partnership free to push ahead with the rollout of Technocracy while the people engage in counter-productive arguments and continually fail to recognise their real enemy: the oligarchs. Just as Renaud Camus, among others, predicted.