[Image via hyperallergic dot com]
This is today’s regular edition of Lockdown Times, Starting with Biomedical.
Biomedical. Dr Sam Bailey gets another article into mainstream media.
Doctor: “Why I no longer give paracetamol to my kids.” Dr Sam Bailey, 9/13/24.
When I was a new mother, one of the things that I considered to be an act of kindness was giving my children paracetamol (known as acetaminophen in North America). It took me a few years to wake up to the terrible errors of this practice and in this article I will explain why.
During medical training we received two years of pharmacology lectures where we were taught everything we were expected to know about drugs. I recall when paracetamol was presented because the lecturer said that despite it being one of the most common medications in the world, not much was known about what it did inside the body. Since I was a student there have been claimed “new insights” into how it works but you will be forgiven if you want to skip the technical details. Suffice to say, once it enters the body the drug is brought to the liver to be metabolised and then passed out in the urine.
The most important point to appreciate here is that paracetamol is a synthetic chemical. It is not something that would ever be found in nature or ingested as part of a healthy diet. In fact, the taste of paracetamol is so repulsive that the liquid formulations for children need to be heavily laced with sweeteners and artificial flavouring. Unfortunately, this is covering up nature’s warning not to swallow something toxic. Indeed, the Mary Poppins song “A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down” was actually a Big Pharma marketing scheme.
Most synthetic medications are said to act through targeted effects on the body which is a somewhat artificial way to look at things. In reality, the body is trying to eliminate these drugs because they are unwelcome poisons. Some of the effects that are experienced, even if claimed to be “therapeutic”, are part of the body’s efforts to flush out the chemicals.
It was not until I encountered the work of Dr Ulric Williams that I corrected the thinking that had been indoctrinated into me during medical training. Dr Williams was a mid-1900s New Zealand physician who abandoned the use of drugs and surgery half way through his career. After this reformation he did not mince words and as he stated in the updated work Terrain Therapy:
“Almost all drugs are poisonous. Many are venomous. Few are even temporarily admissible. None would be required if natural requirements were complied with. Were we not taught not to ‘think’, the stupidity of swallowing or injecting noxious substances with a view to ridding ourselves of the consequence of wrong thinking and living, would hardly need emphasis.”
Once upon a time I would give my children paracetamol if they had a fever. Within an hour their temperature would usually go down and seemingly they looked better. The mistake with such a practice is threefold:
• It interferes with the body’s eliminatory mechanisms of which fever has a vital role.
• The chemical insult adds to the toxic burden of the body.
• It does not address the underlying reason for the fever.
With regard to point one, I would encourage readers to watch my presentation “The Truth About Fever” where I explain why the medical system under-appreciates the significance of fever and makes errors in its management. Fever is not something to be suppressed but rather encouraged in order to enhance the body’s perfectly designed mechanisms to eliminate toxins and restore perfect health. Fever is not the disease, it is the body’s healing efforts in response to a problem.
With regard to point two, this article has outlined the fact that paracetamol is treated as a toxin by the body. It is well known that higher doses of the medication can rapidly lead to liver failure and death. Perhaps less well known is that the drug depletes glutathione because this compound is required to help eliminate paracetamol from the body. If the glutathione detoxification pathway is already being stretched by an underlying illness then it is unwise to deplete it even further.
Finally, with regard to point three, the administration of paracetamol simply covers up symptoms rather than addresses the reason(s) they came about. For example, in a young child even constipation can cause a rise in temperature. The solution is to encourage elimination from the bowel, not “treat” the temperature and leave the child with a gut full of waste. Similarly, when a child complains of a “tummy ache”. Instead of reaching for the paracetamol it needs to be asked what precipitated the condition which may be anything from dietary errors through to underlying psychological distress. Dishing out some pain relief may seem like a kind thing to do but unfortunately it can enable propagation of the problem.
We no longer use paracetamol for our family and do not miss it at all. Other families have also informed me that once they decide not to use it, the need for it also seems to disappear. A better understanding of health is reached including addressing problems at an earlier stage if not avoiding them altogether.
Readers may be thinking, “is there ever an occasion when paracetamol could be used?” In the case of surgery or medical emergencies then perhaps it may have an acute role. However, such episodes are rare amongst the widespread use of the medication in our community’s youngest members. Nobody gets sick because of a paracetamol deficiency so keep that in mind next time you are tempted to reach for it!
Dr Sam Bailey is a medical author and health educator from New Zealand. Her books include Virus Mania, Terrain Therapy and The Final Pandemic.
And, yet another FOIA request by Christine Massey fails to yield the wanted evidence.
...or a genome, or... anything, actually. Christine Massey, 9/14/24.
Greetings and Best Wishes,
September 13, 2024:
Sarah B. Kotler (“J.D.”) acting as Director, Division of Freedom of Information, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officially responded to my FOIA order for studies held by the FDA, authored by anyone, anywhere:
1. that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of the alleged SARS-COV-2, or
2. that even describe the purification of particles alleged to be SARS-COV-2 directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called "hosts", or
3. that describe the purported "genome" of the alleged SARS-COV-2 being found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a so-called "host" (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka computer modelled), or
4. that scientifically demonstrate the claimed contagious nature of the illness / symptoms allegedly caused by the (never-shown-to-exist) SARS-COV-2.
In Sarah’s September 13, 2024 “SARS-COV-2” response letter (FDA FOIA 2024-7837) (pgs 9/10) she recycled wording and excuses used in responses to equivalent FOIA orders relating to the alleged “monkeypox virus” and “avian influenza virus” - for which the “experts” at FDA also have no scientific evidence. Here are the recycled sentences: “The FDA does not regulate or treat viruses. The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices; and by ensuring the safety of our nation's food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.”[Screen shot]
However this time Sarah omitted the following key sentence that normally follows, so illogically and embarrassingly, the above sentences in her “virus” FOIA confessions: “Therefore, we have no responsive records.” Please see for yourself: here is what Sarah wrote in her monkeypox virus/contagion/genome response (FDA FOIA 2024-7353)…[Screen shot] …and here is what Sarah wrote in her avian influenza virus/contagion/genome response (FDA FOIA 2024-6486):[Screen shot]
Those are the exact same sentences as in Sarah’s new “SARS-COV-2” response. The only difference is that this time she left out the actual response/confession: “we have no responsive records”.
The “logic” at play in “J.D.” (Juris Doctor) Sarah B. Kotler’s previous confessions is that the “experts” at FDA determine the accuracy of tests and the efficacy of quackcines, other drugs, devices, etc. by NOT having a shred of scientific evidence showing that the purported “viruses” in question actually exist and by NOT having (or requiring anyone else to have) a valid gold standard against which to assess the products that they rubberstamp… and that this is how the geniuses at FDA “protect public health”… which of course makes zero sense.
As insane as that sounds, you can see it for yourself in Sarah’s earlier response letters by clicking on the links above.
I have asked Sarah for a revised SARS-COV-2 response that actually answers my FOIA order and she will likely get back to me with an explicit confession that the “experts” at FDA have been caught bluffing, once again. Her only other option will be to cite pseudoscientific studies. Either way, the response will bring further embarrassment, disgrace and evidence of criminality onto the clown-show called FDA.[Screen shot]
How can I be so confident that Sarah won’t be able to cite any valid scientific evidence? Because the foundational “SARS-COV-2” studies are idiotic, as is virology as a whole, and because 224 institutions in 40 countries were already formally challenged and demonstrated that they also cannot cite a shred of scientific evidence for the existence of SARS-COV-2 (see the links to Official Confessions/Evidence further below).
If you are new to this topic there is a massive body of educational material awaiting your discovery, some of which can be found here. Fortunately, anyone can understand the problems with virology once they are pointed out. Below are links to some newer materials as well.[All these have links in the text]
Note: this newsletter was also sent to ~200 people who work for “the state”, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., and to people calling themselves “Senator” on the land known as Canada, so they can’t claim later that they didn’t know.
ViroLIEgy 101: Logical Fallacies - Mike Stone
The flawed reasoning ingrained within the foundations of virology has infected the minds of those who consider themselves rational thinkers.
Dr Fauci's West Nile Virus - Dr Sam Bailey
What if Everything You Know About Viruses is Wrong? - Dr. Tom Cowan with Nathan Maingard
The Healthy Sick - Mike Stone, viroLIEgy dot com
The Truth About Contagion - Dr Sam Bailey
Is Eastern Equine Encephalitis Caused By A Virus? - Dr. Andrew Kaufman
Dr. Tom Cowan on the Kim Iversen show
An update on the latest mpox fear-mongering - Dawn Lester
Dr. Mike Yeadon’s message to a “World Council for Health” ivermectin-pusher, re treating imaginary “covid-19” with a toxic drug (Dr. Yeadon is the former VP and Chief Scientist at Pfizer’s Allergy and Respiratory Research Division)
Whooping Cough and the Vaccine Myth - Dr Sam Bailey
Missouri man tests positive for bird flu: yeah, sure, uh-huh - Jon Rappoport
Monkeypox / bird flu / viruses are all…. lies - my recent brief chat with Christopher James of A Warrior Calls
Daniel Roytas’ parasites presentation, with Dr. Tom Cowan
Rickard/Harrison Claim Seriously Defective, Will Never Get To Trial - Canuck Law
Official Confessions/Evidence Showing that Virology is Pseudoscience [SNIP]….
My comments at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 9/14/24.. Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
Once again, good going, Christine. And you worded this one in a way that even the Grand Zuke cannot contend amounts to "false information." The FDA was unable to respond to your requests with *scientific evidence*, period!!
4IR. Planet Waves FM show, some commentary on “the situation” we inhabit.
Tonight's program is for the Pisces Full Moon conjunct Neptune, which is a partial lunar eclipse. I discuss the nature of the astral plane, of which digital consciousness is part — and much more. Eric Francis Coppolino, 9/14/24.
Go to New Program [Link, three and a half hours]
Welcome to The Next Planet Waves FM. Tonight's program is for the Pisces Full Moon and partial lunar eclipse, conjunct Neptune, Tuesday, Sept. 17 (released early). My topics will all consider the polarized nature of the astral plane, of which digital consciousness is a manifestation. Shri Yantra Studio continues with a discussion of the turning toward, the turning away: why exactly is the notion and existence of ‘woman’ so controversial? All music by Vision Quest. All poems by Eric Francis.
Vision Quest is Eric Francis, Daniel Grimsland and Daniel Marc.
My comment at the page,
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, m9/14/24.
Good call about how digital conditions inherently polarize, given they are organized around entities which are either zeros or ones. in actual substance. Yes, this disembodiment greatly facilitated 9/11, and even more, "COVID."
The dominant spectacle has "progressed" from a false flag event, a real material event whose very nature was hidden, distorted, .... anything except what actually happened, to an alleged event/situation with no material foundation to it at all, with every single leg of the 3-legged official "Pandemic"/"COVID-19"/"SARS-Cov-2” narrative having zero basis in reality.
It was an illusion of a "pandemic" created via news stories, featuring a disease distinguishable only via tests, and tests based upon digital models, existing only as computer files, never authenticated by an actual physical entity via isolation and purification. Why mess up an operation with actual physical aspects when the general population is so out of touch with physical reality that mere online stories would suffice?!
In my humble opinion and based upon my experience and knowledge, the Internet was never really meant to be a realm of freedom. It was created as a project of ARPA, the forerunner of DARPA, with the aim of facilitating the operations of the military industrial complex, and this complex has always retained ultimate control "Surveillance Valley" by Yasha Levine is a good read on that, even if he has gotten the counterculture, 9/11 and (after the book came out) "COVID" totally wrong.
I “joined” the Web this month in 1991, via the Well, one of the very first online forums. Already by that point, i could see extreme contentiousness at work, even on a conference within the Well frequented by Deadheads. This culture group is such that five Deadheads will have five strongly differing opinions on a show they had just seen, if not 8 such opinions. And the digital format was elevating contentiousness to new levels. True, things have gotten worse, there were a lot more open spaces available at first, but that's because the already-planned process of rounding up all the participation took a while to actually implement,
I do try to provoke people via my Substack,,,, provoke people to think. I think too many social influences work to put people to sleep, comfortable numbness. Not remotely the same as provoking them to take physical action against people in their immediate lives, which i do see all too many people advocate.
I smoke a very small quantity of cannabis daily. I take care to avoid making online participation the very first thing i do after the act. Yoga is by far the most likely activity, followed by playing music, followed by going on a walk or (when i had such avenues) gardening. The point is to re-focus, like using a tuning fork. A guest Daniel Zeck had on his show a few months ago, who used to have a cannabis shop when the business got brought out by corporate interests, they pushed usage of substances with incredibly high levels of THC in concentrated form, especially edibles, with the goal of rendering people inert passive consumers rather than thinking beings. He got out, started something new. "SET and SETTING," as the pioneers of the counterculture always insisted.
Ending this segment and this edition, What’s Left? discusses the US elections together with a guest from the Worker’s League.
What’s Left? 9/15/24. An hour and 18 minutes.
"Kate Frey from the Worker’s League discusses her groups rationale behind their support for Emanuel Pastreich, a former GP candidate for President in 2020 but not this year. Check us out!”
My comments. Thanks, Andy, Kenny and Kate.
Pastriech, it is pointed out, has stated he is NOT running for president in a serious way, he’s just using the campaign to reach out to people. He’s anti-capitalist in a vague way, not really a Marxist (or really Marx-informed either). I agree with you, Andy and Kenny, that the system is itself rotten, doesn’t matter the candidate. The reality is that the state is a social institution which depends for its health upon the health of the total capital located in its area of jurisdiction. Its revenue comes from the profits of capital as well as from bonds, really borrowing money from bond purchasers, who are overwhelmingly large entities (e;.g. banks) and the very rich. The modern nation-state and capital have been joined at the hip since they emerged simultaneously onto the stage of history in late medieval England, wherever else the system subsequently spread to (now encompassing the entire world), and remain so joined. The state can only be an enforcer for capital as a whole, even though this means possibly going against the interests of particular capitalists at times.
Good move, Andy, stating that you ARE a "Denialist" regarding the 'COVID" word, in contrast to Kate.
One thing: Kate asserted that the security state is solidifying around the Democrats. This completely ignores the key endorsements of Trump by people who are central to the digital state/social impact investment complex which is at the heart of the 4IR, people such as Peter Thiel (PayPal, Palantir, FB), Elon Musk, and Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, co-founders and co-heads of social impact investment giant A16Z.