Starting with Biomedical. Several BIG items.
Biomedical. Christine Massey obtains yet one more big admission from a major public health agency.
Christine Massey, 6/28/24. Links in the text.
Greetings and Best Wishes,
In April I published a failed freedom of information response from Denmark showing that the “experts” at Statens Serum Institut have no scientific evidence showing that "HPV" even exists let alone causes cancer. An earlier newsletter featured the same failure from Denmark’s Hvidovre Hospital and resident test-pusher / “virus” story-teller Jesper Bonde. It also included one of my favourite videos - the “Disruption Corona Press Conference Denmark Sept 29th 2020” wherein people who fancy themselves “health authorities” were confronted by journalist Kristofer Krarup with their own official “SARS-COV-2” confessions/failures regarding the imaginary “SARS-CoV-2”.
That newsletter also linked to the “experts’” earlier confessions of having no record of any alleged “virus” for which they recommend childhood quackcines having been found in and purified from any sick person, by anyone, anywhere… even though purification is an essential preliminary step in scientifically testing a “virus” hypothesis.
Sundhedsstyrelsen “experts” have no valid evidence to back up claims/products/offers
Now let’s have a look at the 3rd official response that Ruth Thorresen obtained from Danish “experts”. On July 26, 2023 Ruth sent a request to the so-called Danish Health Authority, Sundhedsstyrelsen, under the Danish Act on Public Access to Public Administration for full access to (emphasis is mine; see pgs 7-8):[Emphasis by Massey]
"1. All studies and/or reports in the custody of or administered by the Danish Health Authority, Statens Serum Institut (Danish sector research institute), hospitals, universities, and/or any other entity worldwide that describe and scientifically prove the isolation and purification (via maceration, filtration and use of ultracentrifugation; commonly referred to as "isolation") of "HPV" i.e. "Human Papillomavirus" directly from a sample taken from a sick patient, where the sample material has not first been mixed with other genetic material (such as monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum, HEK-293, HUH7, etc.)…
2. All studies and/or reports in the custody of or administered by the Danish Health Authority… that scientifically prove that HPV causes cervical cancer."
Ruth also requested citations for any such studies that are already publicly available. On July 31, 2023 Eva Marie Blichfeldt-Moltke responded and confessed (pgs 9/10) on behalf of “the authority” that (emphasis is mine):
“The Danish Health and Medicines Authority is unable to send you files that match your request because the Danish Health and Medicines Authority does not have the type of material you are looking for.”
Sundhedsstyrelsen agent obfuscates Eva Marie couldn’t leave such a confession hanging in the air and so she continued by vaguely and unhelpfully citing lists of dozens and dozens of studies unrelated to the request: “In your email, you mention the Danish Health Authority's recommendations for cervical cancer screening. In this publication, you will also find a reference list that shows which studies are, among others, used to develop the recommendations. In addition, a number of studies on HPV have been included in the preparation of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority's medical technology assessment of HPV vaccination for boys, which are listed in the reference list of the publication.”
(The screening propaganda referenced by Eva Marie is here.)[Link]
And then Eva Marie rambled on irrelevantly (my emphasis):
“The Danish Health and Medicines Authority can inform that human papillomavirus (HPV) and the association between HPV and cervical cancer (as well as various other rare cancer types) have been described by, among others, World Health Organization (WHO), the European Center for Disease Prevention and Disease Control (ECDC) and Statens Serum Institut (SSI) as well as many other countries' health authorities.
The WHO and ECDC websites provide a range of information and publications on the incidence and prevalence of HPV worldwide. See for example
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) (who. dot int)
- Human papillomavirus (europa dot eu)
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection (ssi dot dk)
- Cervical cancer (who dot int)
Regarding the studies you are interested in, I have to refer you to various scientific journals. Please note that in some cases you may have to pay to read the articles, while others will be freely available on the internet. The Danish Health and Medicines Authority is not in a position to provide specifics for these studies, as the number of studies on HPV is very large and available on several different platforms.”
To which Ruth responded (pg 11): “…I am not presented with relevant scientific evidence that supports the use of the test in question and on which I can base my informed consent… I must conclude that the HPV home test and the claim that HPV causes cervical cancer are obviously not based on a solid scientific foundation…”
Eva Maria wrote back with unsubstantiated claims of “scientific evidence” and an admission that “the Danish Health Authority” relies on recommendations from globalists and advice from “leading experts”. Her vague, unhelpful response is on page 12.
(Note: this information has been sent to ~200 people who work for “the state”, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., so that they can’t claim later that they didn’t know.) [More information and related items follow]…
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 6/29/24 .Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
More responses like that, and maybe the default public response to official claims of viruses will become "prove it, via physical isolation and purification." Well, a boy can dream. :-)
Thanks again, Christine. The sexual transmission one is a hard one for many people to get over, it brings in lots of personal emotions. That's why it's so important to debunk it.
And, an excellent item from a Substack i had never heard of before yesterday, its substance is about virology as ideology. Several segments from a LONG item.
Virology: An unwitting master class in exposing pseudoscience. Anthony Colpo, 7/1/24.
Recently overheard conversation between virologist and normal person with an honest job:
Virologist: There are leprechauns living in my closet.
Normal person: Really? Can you show me?
V: No, they're invisible.
NP: Can I reach into your closet and feel around for them?
V: No, because when you try to touch them they instantly transform from solid to a gas.
NP: OK, so let me get this straight. You're saying there are leprechauns living in your closet, but it's impossible to see or feel them.
V: Correct.
NP: So how, exactly, do you know they exist?
V: Well, I once left some cheese in the closet. The next morning, it was gone. That means the leprechauns ate it. It's called the "lepropathic effect."
NP: Are those mice droppings I see over there?
V: Where?
NP: There.
V: Yeah.
NP: You have mice droppings in your closet, which means mice are getting in here. Mice eat cheese. But you're claiming when you leave cheese here and it's gone the next morning, it's proof that invisible, phantom leprechauns live in your closet?
V: That's right.
NP: Are you on drugs? Seriously, that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard!
V: I've got images of leprechaun footprints taken through my really powerful magnifying glass to prove it! Here, look at these!
NP: Yes, I see them ... but they're not ‘leprechaun’ footprints. They look just like mouse paw prints.
V: [Explodes with rage] You're a leprechaun DENIER! You're a donkey that DOESN’T UNDERSTAND leprechology! You and the rest of the no-leprechaun crowd are soooo ANTI-SCIENCE!! It’s SELFISH PEOPLE LIKE YOU who PUT EVERYONE ELSE AT RISK!!
NP: [Calls 911 for paramedic assistance] Hi, I've got a guy here having some sort of mental episode. There are mice getting into his closet, but he insists they're leprechauns. I tried to explain it was mice, but he’s become very agitated and hostile.
911: He wouldn't happen to be a virologist, by any chance?
NP: Yes, how did you know?
911: Oh, you wouldn't believe how many calls we get about those guys. Listen, he can't be helped. Best thing you can do is just get out of there. And for heaven's sake, if he offers you any “antiviral” drugs or “safe and effective” gene therapies, run like your life depends on it!
NP: Gotcha, thanks for your help!
Pseudoscientists are a predictable lot. They routinely spout untenable nonsense and frequently get away with it, because most people aren't well-schooled in the fundamentals of logic and reason, let alone science .As their beliefs gain an increasingly larger audience, pseudoscientists start to assume an air of invincibility and omnipotence. The very fact their ideas have such widespread acceptance is, in their minds, further proof of their veracity. People whose beliefs thrive largely because of ignorance, popular consensus and authority appeal tend to do poorly when challenged on scientific grounds.
At first, they’ll attempt to address critiques with more pseudoscience. This, however, results in an argument that becomes increasingly untenable, self-contradictory and often downright absurd. Frustrated by the results of their self-defeating attempts to expound on The Science™, they quickly revert to their natural environment:The gutter.
They abandon all pretense at science, and unleash a barrage of anti-logic and ad hominem attacks. This barrage will feature lies, dishonesty, smug condescension, red herrings, appeals to authority - everything except irrefutable evidence of the controlled scientific kind. Unable to refute important criticisms, they will talk as if their beliefs are self-evident and beyond challenge. You will be called a “denier” and “conspiracy theorist” for having the temerity to question their very questionable claims. They will retort that you have no formal scientific qualifications (i.e, you don’t have a piece of paper saying you spent several years at a government/globalist-controlled inculcation facility that receives large amounts of money from drug companies).
A Not-So-Nice Attempt to Undermine Critics of Virology
One of my valued readers recently posted a link to a Substack post by a guy called Matthew Aldred titled “Viruses and DNA Are 'Just' Models?” The post’s subtitle reads “And governments sprayed toxins on people to make them think they had COVID?” So before I even start reading the post, it’s clear its intent is to portray virus skeptics as a bunch of cuckoo conspiracy theorists……
In his view, it’s not virology that lays claim to undeniable truths based on scant evidence - it is those of us who identify the huge cracks in virology’s foundation.
It bears reminding that virology, to this day, still cannot even begin to physically isolate an alleged ‘virus.’ It is virology that claims you can ‘isolate’ an RNA- or DNA-virus by adding things like culture medium, bovine fetal serum and cell lines, which inevitably contaminate the mixture with extraneous RNA and likely DNA. This is the very opposite of isolation!
It is virology that makes the self-serving and highly convenient claim that viruses can’t be isolated like bacteria can, because a virus needs a living host to survive and replicate. Michael Palmer, MD and Suchairt Bhakdi are textbook classic purveyors of this ruse, writing “Viruses, by their very nature, can only multiply within living cells but not in pure culture.”
“The legend that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated,” they continue, “is founded solely on the rigid demand that such isolation be accomplished without the use of cell cultures.” Viruses can’t party hardy without first shacking up in a living cell, they claim, and therefore it’s “rigid” and unreasonable to expect scientists to isolate a virus in pure cell culture. A most curious claim, because during the COVIDiot years we were instructed to spray and wipe down everything in sight until our surroundings reeked like a hospital.
Which begs an obvious question: Why did we need to disinfect inanimate objects to guard against a pathogen that can only survive and replicate inside living hosts? The Sars-Cov-2 virus, claimed people from the CDC and Fauci’s NIAID masquerading as scientists, “can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days.”
Listen virus-believers, you can’t have it both ways. Either a virus can survive outside a host, or it can’t. The Experts™ themselves have proclaimed in a leading medical tabloid that the ‘Sars-Cov-2 virus’ can survive on plastic and stainless steel “up to 72 hours after application.” Their words, not mine.
Yet we’re supposed to believe, despite having up to a 72 hour window to do so, none of the world’s sophisticated microbiology labs has been able to take a single electron micograph happy snap of a single Sars-Cov-2 virion without first mixing non-purified patient samples with a bunch of other RNA- and DNA-containing material?….
In fact, the seminal 1954 ‘isolation’ paper [regarding the measles virus, allegedly] by [John Franklin}Enders and Peebles almost undermined the entire virus charade. They admit in the paper that “an uninoculated culture of monkey kidney cells” also demonstrated the cytopathic effect! Rather than entertain the possibility that the cell culture isolation charade was untenable, they simply declared, without any evidence whatsoever, that this unexpected 'cytopathic effect' was due to an unknown "agent" and then quickly moved on like nothing ever happened.
The world of virology learned a valuable lesson: Never perform true control procedures during the cell culture isolation gig, because it could undermine the entire ruse…..
The Chinese were the first to claim ‘isolation’ of the mythical ‘Sars-Cov-2.’ Shortly afterwards, the Doherty Institute in Melbourne, Australia loudly boasted it was the first entity outside of China to isolate the Woohoo virus. Any discussion of whether Sars-Cov-2 exists must discuss these studies and the numerous absurdities and inconsistencies contained within them.[The Chinese papers are by the Fan Wu, LiLi Ren and the Peng Zhou teams]
Aldred won’t touch them. Neither do pandemic shills like Steve Kirsch or Robert Malone or virologist Ian M. Mackay (a WEF ‘agenda contributor’) or Imperial College-indoctrinated Dr Siouxsie Wiles, all of whom rabidly insist Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated. That’s okay. I’m happy to discuss them. In fact, I already have, at length:[Two citations of items by him]
The Doherty study was an utter joke. They couldn't find anything that looked like a coronavirus during their cell culture escapade, so they squirted some trypsin - a protein-digesting enzyme - into the mix, and when particles in that mix developed ragged edges they promptly declared them to be the spikes of a coronavirus! Aldred expects us to accept rubbish like this as proof of a 'novel' and deadly coronavirus?
The Doherty researchers also admit they conducted no control procedures during their genetic sequencing caper, and their 'isolation' endeavor involved no control procedure using samples from healthy control subjects. When asked if they tested for other ‘viral’ genomes, the Doherty researchers even admitted: "We did not look for other viral genomes. Our assembly was performed against the released Wuhan-1 reference sequence as we were looking for Sars-CoV-2."
I don’t know how much more obvious it gets: Come hell or high water, the Doherty researchers were going to find ‘Sars-Cov-2’ - even if they had to handsculpt it with trypsin and willfully blind themselves to the possibility that other ‘virus’ genomes may be present. To refuse to accept such anti-scientific rot as evidence of anything is not being a “denialist” or “conspiracist” - it simply means you refuse to be a gullible idiot. Ditto with the various papers released by the Chinese who claim to have first isolated Sars-Cov-2. As I outline in some detail, those papers are a vague, incoherent and suspicious mess, and when I emailed three of the researchers to get some clarification, the answer was ... total silence. [Links. More follows]…….
And, Eric Francis Coppolino’s Planet Waves program of last Friday dealt in a major way with food, a key aspect of Biomedical.
Tonight's wide-reaching program actually starts with a discussion of Thursday's "debate" and wends its way through much interesting territory and lands in Greenwich Village on 6/28/69. Eric Francis Coppolino, 6/28/24.
Go To Program [Link to Planet Waves FM program page, full program is three hours and 50 minutes]
Brian Eno segment on Gaza starts at about 40 minutes. Brazilian medicine man Otavio Mendes starts at about 1:33. Tantra Studio on the Stonewall chart starts at about 3:10. If you are going to navigate the program this way, it’s probably easier to download the show and then use a music player.
Thank you for supporting the program with a paid subscription to this Substack or by direct donation to Chiron Return. Your funds help cover costs of Planet Waves FM and other projects of Chiron Return, including our ongoing work on the chronology.
My comments at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 6/28/24.
Excellent point about the Eno/Barat discussion's failure to bring up the context of digital society and its general disembodiment of human beings. These disembodied beings are seeing what's going on in Gaza and are incapable of grasping this because they are disconnected from reality.
Point of information. The US has never been dependent upon "Middle East" oil for the American nation state's own supplies. Even when the US imported a huge percentage of the oil used, the big 3 suppliers were Canada, Mexico and Venezuela. But the nations of Europe and Asia are dependent upon these supplies. And this has been a big reason for US global domination since WWII, as its domination of oil producers in the "Middle East" and the general use of the dollar as the basic trading currency for oil has meant the control of supplies to rival industrial powers, imagined and real.
Good point about Assange's confession being coerced.
There is one positive thing to the Biden-Trump fiasco last night. The utterly demented state of the political system as a whole, a system which has made one of these two the likely winner of the next presidential race, is out there to see. The system from the very beginning in the 18th CEntury has served to mask the actual nature of power, hiding the absolute rule by the ruling rich elite behind the curtain of elections which provide the illusion that the people select the decision makers who govern them, rather than merely choosing between people competing to be flunkies for these elites, auditioning for the role of enforcers of the ruling order.
And glad to see you finally did get around to play the Gang of Four, which you have talked about doing for a while. "Return the Gift" was one of my favorite tracks on their first album, Entertainment. Damn, it's been over 44 years since first hearing it, which i did under.... special conditions.
Jeffrey Strahl
Lockdown Times, 6/29/24.
Listened to the Otavio Mendes segment. Lots of good stuff, and some stuff that's "questionable," to put it mildly.
Cannabis use in moderation does not have detrimental effects, period. Smoking is actually better than eating in the sense of one's ability to control the intake, unless this intake is very specifically measured. What is "moderate"? Studies in Jamaica and Costa Rica failed to find adverse effects even in heavy daily smokers. Smoking a fingernail's worth on a daily basis is simply not even on the register. Eating heavy doses daily has unknown consequences, not enough data, probably not a good idea. And just like everything, heavy use at a time of mass digital disembodiment is just another confounding factor, problematic.
The nutrition part had good parts. Seed oils are not pretty uniformly not good, neither are the shortenings like Crisco. Corn fructose syrup really bad. Aspertame pretty bad. I avoid caffeine and glutten. But the meat discussion totally left out the nature of meat produced by industrial farming, and this i felt was really unconscionable. He left out the land and water requirements for meat raising and production, focusing on BS like the global warming effects. I felt Otavio was a non-stop ad for meat consumption and non-stop detractor of vegetarian and vegan practices. Sorry, i know lots of people who can contradict much of what he said, and he is not a nutritionist. But interesting conversation.
A different perspective about meat. Dr Daniel Roytas talks to a herbal therapist who in turns out specializes in the vagus nerve, a fascinating topic for me. He deals with the current fashion of blaming plant consumption for human ailments, The Humanley Podcast Episode 79, 6/7/24. Episode 79: Emrys Goldsworthy - Ex-carnivores [I posted this in the 6/10/24 edition of LT]
"There is a growing trend to blame the consumption of plant foods as the cause of disease. It is said that naturally occurring plant compounds cause disease in healthy people. Ex-carnivores Daniel and Emrys take a deep dive into this topic. Do the consumption of edible plants really cause disease, or are there other factors at play? Are plants being used as scapegoats to cover up for the harmful effects of far more insidious causes?
Visit Emrys’ website [Link. Unfortunately it’s wrong, see 6/10/24 ET for the correct one]
And, i rarely agree with Peggy Hall about anything, but do so in this instant, she really unloads on the “health freedom” celebrities. It really pains me to see so many “freedom” activists who are still clinging to these celebrities, no matter what.
Why the Obsession with "Vaccine Safety"? It only ENRICHES Big pHARMa. This tired narrative being pushed by Bigtree, RFK Jr and Steve Kirsch is really getting on my nerves.Peggy Hall, 6/29/24.[See peggyhallsubstack dot com]
"That's [focusing on trying to make a poison safer] akin to giving a condom to a rapist.....
Every time Bigtree or RFK Jr or Steve Kirsch pushes for more safety testing, they are lining the pockets of big pHARMa, as well as enriching Granny Gates, because those nefarious players all BENEFIT from the ruse of safety testing. "
A+++!
4IR. What’s Left delivers part II of the discussion about the RAND Corporation’s papers on the Noosphere, this time looking at the 2020 paper, the update to the one from 1990.
Whose Story Wins, What’s Left? 6/29/24, an hour and 9 minutes.
"In the most recent installment of RAND articles on the Noosphere, its authors assess the development of the Noosphere some 20 years since recommending the US move from realpolitik to noopolitik. Do their predictions and assessments hold up to the reality of time and events. We discuss that. Check us out!”[Links to the RAND article and other items]
My comments, edited to add another sentence.
Thanks, Kenny, Andy and Don Eduardo.
Good point about the last 25 years and the bizarre ignoring of The War on Terror and what really ensued in the various wars. And good for you, particularly Andy and Kenny, for dissolving illusions many “freedom” folks have in the BRICS, as if that’s anything except a congregation of thugs.
But i think you're missing the thrust of this document, because you're once again seeing only one side of the core capitalist dialectic playing out, the competition/fragmentation one which is leading to war. This will likely dominate due to the material reality, namely growing shortages of energy and critical raw materials coupled with worsening ecocide. But in the meantime, the other side of the dialectic, the concentration/centralization one, is being pursued, because none of the big players are really able to get their way.
Yes, the US lost Afghanistan. But neither China nor Russia won that one. The Taliban regime is facing a growing insurgency by ISIL (re-branded ISIS), centered in the Tajik minority (26%) which is aiming at spreading its power across international borders, into Tajikistan and Uzbekistan at first, and further later on. This is creating massive instability in Central Asia, a region of high interest for both Russia and China. Likewise, there's growing instability in Southwest Asia, again not in the interest of Russia and China.
The soft power advocated by the RAND document is really about pushing the concentration/centralization dynamic, pitching it as being of mutual benefit to the other competing powers. The elites are to exercise soft power against one another while cracking down hard on their populations, via growing surveillance. 9/11 demonstrated a willingness by the elites to cooperate by fighting an imagined threat to all of them. 3/11 (i.e. the start of the "COVID" Psy Op) demonstrated a willingness to go even further and use a media event to justify cooperation, the event itself featuring a unified story as to what's going on. The RAND document may have come out before 3/11 but the event had already been anticipated.
Since then, efforts have been made to get everyone on the same WHO page, something all the players seem at least willing to do. Likewise regarding the general implementation of CBDCs and the UN's SDGs program. This is the transfer-of-power-to-the-G20 agenda being promoted by the likes of the Council on Foreign Relations.
War is increasingly in the cards. In the meantime, the surveillance/computerized governance global apparatus will increasingly be built and pursued as much as possible.
Ending this segment and this edition, Alison McDowell’s last blog entry. turning healers and body workers into a global investment market.
Auto-Tuned Biofields and Curious Ontopoesis, Alison McDowell, 6/29/24.
This week Stephers came across a document that was put out by the Consciousness and Healing Initiative in 2020 with financial support from Jason Youtopolous (former head of SAP Global Research) with the Emerald Gate Foundation, the Walker Family Foundation (Jeffrey C. Walker formerly of JP Morgan, MIT Media Lab, Berklee School of Music and Board Chair of New Profit) and Tom Dingledine (oil exploration, UVA, and Wake Forest University donor).
“Subtle Energy and Biofield Healing: Evidence, Practice, and Future Directions” is a systems change plan to implement standards, evidence collection, and technology development that will restructure loosely networked healers and body workers into a global investment market. I believe those markets will, in turn, manage human psyches and etheric fields in the name of “health,” “wellbeing,” and “self-care” through telemedicine. The ultimate goal is to replace healers with apps linked to blockchain health records / digital twins, optimizing agents in the simulation and facilitating noetic convergence.
Bobby and Nicole’s promotion of AI-mediated healthcare and Web3 to address our nation’s chronic health “emergency” would dovetail nicely with such an effort. Remember, RFK Jr. gave a keynote speech at the 2008 Omega Institute conference in Rhinebeck, NY on the importance of water to carbon-neutral sustainable living.
I anticipate new markets in digital alternative medicine will be hooked up to pay for success finance deals and programs like John Pollak’s CommonHealth Wellcoin effort based out of Cornell-Technion. With JP Morgan and Silicon Valley venture capital involved, how could it not? Oh, and a major funder is the Rob and Melani Walton Foundation. Rob is worth $61 billion as the former chair of Walmart. His sister, Alice, is working closely with Deepak Chopra on community wellness and mindfulness as well as public art.
As with the field of education, my point of entry into the matrix, it seems human involvement will be gradually minimized in favor of automated systems. Touch will be studied and mirrored into AI assistants where sensors and actuators (sound, light, and haptics) end up embedded into spatial computing where they can facilitate our creative human potential as parallel processors in the networked collective, the digital commons as shared computational game board.
Human agents in the “game” remade as gooey, foraging nodes of slime mold in the name of democracy, free markets, and the American way if you are conservative. If you’re an NPR progressive / leftist, then your story will be that we need Web3 digital alternative health to uplift indigenous culture, stop capitalism, and save the planet from the Anthropocene. These folks have enough money to buy all the stories, and they know what each of us wants to hear. They’ll know even more once they use the alternative health space, keepers of etheric bodies, to bring us under their engineered dome.
The two-hour talk below starts with a thought experiment I’ve been having about Web3 possibly being a “language” to interface with energetic elemental beings in a different layer of information space. I need to do more looking into Gurdjieff’s “law of three” and carbon (wallets) signifying action. The language may actually be envisioned as a vehicle for group manifestation into our shared information realm. Yes, I know that sounds highly unusual, but the more research I do the more I realize that high-level physics is not so far off spiritualism. Given all the money that the US military has spent in these areas over the past century makes psychical research hard to discount.
In the talk below, I touch on the movie “Arrival” and Thomas Mayer’s book “Answering the Call of the Elements.” Mayer is an Austrian teacher of Anthroposophic meditation who engages with elementals and has spent several decades working in direct democracy and positive Swiss money systems. Sure sounds to me like token engineering and gamified protocol layers may be a planned communication infrastructure. I then describe several serendipitous experiences I have had in Arkansas over the past month – not really synchronicities, more in the line of ontopoetics, a term I just learned but am enjoying playing with in the context of Wheeler’s participatory universe and Basil Hiley’s non-commutative active information fields. Recent pics are included in the presentation and below. Who knows, there may be some clues I need to refer to later. Enjoy! [Video, an hour and 54 minutes]
My comments. She just keeps getting worse in terms of talking way too fast and wandering off on tangents. Yet she hits some really good points, especially regarding how the Bobby Jr/Nicole campaign, which is getting heavily promoted in the wake of the Biden/Trump debate debacle, fits into this plan. But one again, two major shortcomings. She leaves out the role of global capitalist competition to the death. And worse, she just takes suggestions for plans which care made in elite symposiums as if they are not only viable but already being implemented, never mind the energy and materials requirements for such plans to be realized, especially in an era of growing shortages of energy and raw materials supplies. Papers put out by elite planners routinely show a complete lack of awareness about these shortages. And McDowell doesn’t bother checking, as she also believes there are no such shortages.