Biomedical. A major Canadian health entity confesses it has no evidence for the physical existence of the alleged virus which allegedly causes Avian Flu.
Christine Massey, 6/10/24.
[Screen shot]
Greetings and Best Wishes,
May 10, 2023: “experts” at Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) confessed in a freedom of information (FOI) response to having zero scientific proof of the existence of any alleged “virus” ever claimed to have affected livestock in Canada (see FOI response A2022-00201 / MD here). CFIA is now the “lead agency” in Canada on the supposed “H5N1” health threat.
And so 1 month ago, on May 9, 2024, I filed a follow-up request for all studies in the possession, custody or control of CFIA, authored by anyone, anywhere, since May 10, 2023 or obtained by CFIA since May 10, 2023:
• that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of the alleged “H5N1" and all studies and/or reports in the possession, custody or control of CFIA authored by anyone, anywhere, ever:
• that describe purification of particles that are alleged to be "H5N1" directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of "hosts" (without adding any sources of genetic material or proteins), and/or
• wherein the purported "genome" of this alleged "virus" was found intact (as opposed to fabricated in silico), and/or
• that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by said purported "virus".
June 6, 2024: “Joannis, Helen, Acting Team Leader Access to Information and Privacy” responded (pg 10): “Your request involves a large number of records or necessitates a search through a large number of records and meeting the original time limit would unreasonably interfere with the operations of the Agency. We are therefore taking a time extension of up to 30 days, as defined in paragraph 9(1)(a) of the Act, to complete the processing of your request. The revised due date is July 9, 2024.” :-)
As usual, "fragments" are declared to be "viral" in origin based on zero valid scientific evidence: [Screen shot] By the way, CFIA is part of the “health portfolio” of the man who acts as “The Honourable Mark Holland” and “Minister of Health”. All of the other agencies in Mark’s (investment) portfolio have also been challenged via FOI requests and shown that they are unable to cite any scientific evidence of “SARS-COV-2” or any other alleged “virus” that they’ve been asked about.
Here is one of the dozens and dozens of Dun and Bradstreet entries that come up in a search for “Canadian Food Inspection Agency”. (Dun and Bradstreet = American company offering commercial data, analytics, and insights.)[Screen shot]
If you’re looking for more “H5N1” resources, my newsletter of April 8th includes:
• a Notice of Conditional Acceptance for farmers being harassed by “government” agencies over the imaginary “H5N1”,
• more failed “H5N1” FOI responses from the CDC, Public Health Agency of Canada, Japan's National Institute of Infectious Diseases, UK Animal and Plant Health Agency and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control,
• many “H5N1” articles/videos,
• links to hundreds more “germ”-related FOI responses.
And Dr. Sam Bailey’s video and notes of May 21st cover the recent “H5N1” online meeting (that I was accidentally invited to - lol - and recorded). The meeting was attended by people acting as “public health experts” in Canada who’ve been gearing up to terrorize farmers, cows, chickens, farm cats, raw milk drinkers and the population at large via fake/fraudulent tests, “messaging” etc.[Two screen shots, links]
(Note: this newsletter has been sent to 200+ people who work for “the state”, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., so they cannot claim they don’t know.)
For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 6/10/24. Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
We're watching a psy op unfold in slow motion, largely because we now know to keep our eyes open for such moves. Thanks once again, Christine, very well done.
And, Dr Daniel Roytas talks to a herbal therapist who in turns out specializes in the vagus nerve, a fascinating topic for me. He deals with the current fashion of blaming plant consumption for human ailments.
The Humanley Podcast Episode 79, 6/7/24.
Episode 79: Emrys Goldsworthy - Ex-carnivores
There is a growing trend to blame the consumption of plant foods as the cause of disease. It is said that naturally occurring plant compounds cause disease in healthy people. Ex-carnivores Daniel and Emrys take a deep dive into this topic. Do the consumption of edible plants really cause disease, or are there other factors at play? Are plants being used as scapegoats to cover up for the harmful effects of far more insidious causes?
Visit Emrys’ website [Link. Unfortunately it’s wrong, here’s the correct link. ]
My comments. Fascinating conversation. By the way, i’ve started reading Roytas’s book Can You Catch a Cold? Already i’ve come across several paradigm-shifting segments. More in future editions of LT.
And, Eric Francis Coppolino looks back 4 years, both at an article of his from June 2020 and a collection of responses by Planet Waves readers as to positive aspects, if any, of the lockdown, from the same month.
Flashback to June 2020 — four long years ago — offering responses from my readers about how they benefited from society shutting down, staying home from work, not commuting, and more.. Eric Francis Coppolino, 6/8/24.
Dear Friend and Reader:
Note, this letter has not been professionally proofread and Substack does not play nice with spellcheck on Mozilla for Mac. It just does not work. — efc. I’m in an ongoing discussion with some of my fellow Team Missing Virus presenters (those who concern themselves with what I call the missing virus), where I often take the position that we need to consider the spiritual and social angles that drove the 2020 crisis rather than just the political, corporate, medical and scientific.
Those things are figure; I suggest that for more information, we study the ground: the background, the environment, the not-usually-considered, and the invisible. To that end, I just sent out an article from June 2020 called Planet Waves Reader Experiences of the Lockdown.[Link] With this group and others, I encourage a deeper look at the issue of what drives something like a pre-planned, staged pandemic. When I say that I am not talking about any individuals who were sick or who lost their lives, but what actually happened, and the whole movement of society that was based on many preexisting, well-rehearsed scenarios. Underneath that all were emotional and spiritual factors.
The Virus Issue Still Drives Massive Engagement
The virus issue still drives massive reader engagement and interest, though I’ve backed away from reporting on it. I am grateful to my friends and collegues Mark and Sam Bailey, Christine Massey, Mike Stone, Mike Wallach, Mike Donio (there are a lot of Mikes around this scene), Mike Yeadon, Jeff Strahl and others for their competent reporting and for keeping focus on the issue.
These presenters should all be on my “recommended Substacks” list and if not, they are easy to find. If you’re looking for something or someone specific, ask in the comments. They may not know it, but their ongong work the virus, virology and the medical angle gives me some freedom to consider other issues and to see the world with the wide aperture that I prefer. (As a photographer, most of my photos are created at f2.0, f2.8 or wider, depending on the lens.)
The Coronavirus Novel; Barefoot in Babylon
If you’re curious about my original reporting from the first days, starting in February 2020, I have that compiled in a page called The Coronavirus Novel. These articles remain as published; you will see that through much of 2020 I am taking claims of SARS-CoV-2 at face value for the sake of discussion, while leading an investigative team in the background. It took me about 10 months to work out the rudiments of the missing virus problem, and another year to refine my understanding.
My most influential article from that era was They Were Barefoot in Babylon, which studied the response to the claim of “Hong Kong Flu” at the time of the Woodstock festival. The analysis in this article the heart of my idea that what we call “covid” was above all a phenomenon of the digital environment. [Link]
Just four months in, I had figured that much out.
With love,
This was appended.
"Factors that are not obviously part of the equation are often influential. The content analysis only gets you so far, then it tends to fall apart. The content (plague, war, pestilence) answers an issue or need not necessarily related to the surface theme or topic. The need for a virus crisis does not come from the idea of a virus. I think it comes from a deeper place, spiritually; a deeper crisis. I think in sussing out this kind of issue, it’s good to work with three or four different possibilities.
One of the reasons “covid” sold so big was that Westerners, especially Americans and Brits, just never seem to stop. They go go go go go. Then finally in March 2020, an authority said: OK, you can stay home for a while. Get a break. Had it not been so creepy, the world taking a deep breath in the spring of 2020 would have been refreshing.
In June 2020, I asked my readers to open up about their “silver lining” experiences of the lockdowns. How did they benefit? Here are the responses, in total: [Link, see first part, “Reader Experiences]"
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, 6/8/24.
What seems to be a common theme to at least many if not all of the experiences accounts from back then seems to me to be about a lack of community and a lack of a sense of connection they had been feeling before the event, but apparently seemed to feel they were regaining some as a result of the "pandemic." And indeed a social permission to go slow. Some seemed to think that online can fully sub for face to face. which is disturbing to me.
I had already been retired for a while when everything started in March '20. I didn't need to stop work or commuting routines. I was required to stop or modify most of my relatively few social routines. If there's a silver lining there, it's that i learned how many of the people i was connected with via those routines were really superficial and not at all committed to values i thought were essential. That's a good .. "acid test," which in fact does leave behind silver linings, with touches of grey. :-)
4IR.. First, a music intro to the subject. DOA was the best known band to come out of the Vancouver punk anarchist milieu of the late ‘70s/Early ’80s.
World War 3, DOA, 1980, just over 4 minutes.
And, What’s Left?’s people look at what they see to be a growing tendency toward World War Three
World War III is Here!, What’s Left?, 6/8/24, an hour and 15 minutes,
"As the USA's recent decision to change the rules of war in Ukraine, striking Russian territory and occupied land, we see ourselves facing the next phase: World War III. Or at least that is the take of this episode. Do you agree? Check us out and tell us what you think.[Links]”
My comments.
Thanks, Kenny, Andy and Don Eduardo.
Two segments i totally embrace, One was Kenny stating that ALL the ruling elites, be it the US's, Russia's, China's, everywhere else, need to be deposed, not replaced but their entire structure deposed as well. The other was Andy on how those who look toward the Russian elite or the Chinese elite to save us, or even for someone like Trump (or RFK Jr, or Jill Stein, or Cornell West) to do so, are badly deluded. "The future's here, we're it, we're on our own.”
Regarding the perspective that this entire global nuclear matter is a head fake designed to advance a global Blockchain digital panopticon world government: Alison McDowell and Jake and the like are seeing one side of the core global capitalist dynamic, that of concentration and centralization. The war perspective is emblematic of the other side, competition and concentration.
Which basic one one prevails? Impossible to tell from one moment to the other, but the inexorable march is towards the latter one, given the nature of capital, its systematic dependence upon the extraction of surplus value from human workers for its survival, and the crisis in this extraction. And this is GREATLY accentuated by the material fact that the world IS running out of energy resources and supplies of critical raw materials. Without both of these, further extension of high tech society, let alone its expansion, becomes impossible. This makes securing these resources and supplies an imperative, even if it takes a war. I know Alison McDowell doesn't remotely take this reality into account, indeed even denies it, thinks all such shortages are contrived. It's a sign of how little she has actually looked into the matter.
One thing: talk of a post-war future, even if "only" 60% of the US population is killed, is downright lunacy, crackpot psychosis. The resultant damage to the Earth's ecosystem will be irreparable and irreversible. The survivors will envy the dead.
What happened in 2020, you ask? Come on, guys, that was an op, a global op, designed to push forward at great speed the concentration dynamic, with China, Russia, EU, US, WHO, Pharma, Media, Tech all cooperating closely. I'm surprised you still don't see that.
And, some items from one of my favorite Substack blogs, about a variety of 4IR matters.
News, links, writing, Vincent Kelley, 6/7/24.
“Four Years After COVID, Cancel Culture Returns”
In a guest opinion column at Lee Fang ’s Substack,, Leighton Woodhouse and Jenin Younes demonstrate the incredible similarities in the cancel culture strategy deployed by the left during the pandemic and by the right during Israel’s war on Gaza: During the pandemic, “a quasi-priestly, self-appointed expert class suddenly dictated the boundaries of acceptable discourse on COVID-19 in a mostly successful effort to control our thoughts on the subject. We weren’t allowed to openly question whether school closures would lead to learning loss, especially among less economically privileged students; whether firing people for declining a rushed and, as it turned out, less-than-entirely-efficacious vaccine was an abrogation of workers’ rights; or whether shutting down the economy would hurt working people most of all. To even raise these concerns in polite company, as we both did, led to accusations of selfishness, support for former President Donald Trump, and eventual exile from the circles in which we ran. We watched the activist left descend into a mindless, totalitarian cult, in which the punishment for wrongspeech and wrongthink was the social equivalent of the death penalty.”
Woodhouse and Younes continue: “History repeats itself, a harsh lesson we both learned firsthand not four years later. Since October 7, we have found ourselves once again watching people we befriended and came to admire during the Covid era embrace a blind dogma that replaces evidence, civil discourse, and logic with censorship, bullying, and accusations of antisemitism designed to chill dissent. This time, though, those engaging in these rhetorical tactics have clustered on the political right, as well as in the ‘heterodox’ space that purports to transcend the tribalism of the left-right divide and with which we both briefly identified.”
For more on this topic, see my articles, “The ‘Free Speech’ Right Embraces Cancel Culture” and “In Defense of Woke Zoomers.”[Links]
“Private Thought and Public Speech”
On a related theme,
David Bromwich draws on the “intuitive and too seldom noticed points of ordinary psychology” to address the relationship between private thought and public speech at Compact Magazine: “The truth is that many people first discover the depth of a given belief, or even the fact that they hold the belief at all, when they hear its opposite enunciated and find themselves saying No. We may say no at first to ourselves. But I think an early experience of saying no, out loud, is for many people their first intimation of self-knowledge. It can be a starting point, too, for a kind of social knowledge that in more graduated terms will lead to a patient involvement in public arguments that have more than one side. Those arguments are conducted in a mode of speaking and listening in which it is possible to hear sentences such as ‘Why do you put it like that?’ or ‘Can you remind me of the evidence?’ The radical and self-formative power of hearing oneself say no, often for reasons one could hardly explain initially, seems elemental in our moral nature. It is, in fact, as vital to the growth of conscience as the act of willful disobedience about which one is later compelled to reflect with an uneasy mind.
Bromwich concludes with reflections on how social media has impacted the relationship between private thought and public speech: “Others have warned against the conformist pressure of social media; but the pessimistic prognosis can’t be repeated too often. For all the advantages they bring, in the form of a quick, free, and wide diffusion of new facts or presumed facts, social media have become a tacit and in some measure paralyzing influence on free inquiry, not only in education but in less purposeful social settings. Universities, in particular, ought to take a public stand against the dulling-down of spirited conversation that has been an unintended consequence of the presence of social media. The possibility of being misquoted, or quoted and characterized misleadingly, is a constant presence in the minds of most students and many teachers. The pervasive known presence of social media makes the anonymous report a likely channel of reward or of dangerous rebuke. It seems in the interest of education, more broadly, to discourage the use of either signed or anonymous reports on the non-public utterances of other people. The cost of having ignored this encumbrance of being watched and unkindly overheard without our permission has been a drastic reduction of the natural energetic contact between private thoughts and public speech, which is to say: a loss of the virtue of sincerity, without which all thought and all speech are worthless.”
For more on issues of speech, see my two-part essay, “Why Free Speech?” (You can read Part 1 here and Part 2 here).
The Internet’s Final Frontier: Remote Amazon Tribes
The New York Times reports on the introduction of the internet to the Marubo tribe in the Amazon: “The 2,000-member tribe is one of hundreds across Brazil that are suddenly logging on with Starlink, the satellite-internet service from Space X, [Elon] Musk’s private space company. Since its entry into Brazil in 2022, Starlink has swept across the world’s largest rainforest, bringing the web to one of the last offline places on Earth.”…..
“Return to Janesville — Life After Manufacturing in America’s Heartland”
At The Financial Times, Amy Goldstein reflects on her 2017 book, Janesville, about the deindustrialization of a Wisconsin town in the wake of a General Motors plant closure in 2008: “Falling out of the middle class, I learnt, is not the same as having been poor all along, bruising people’s identity along with their standard of living. Job retraining, I found, was not always a panacea. And as the 2016 election cycle was bringing Donald Trump to the fore, I saw the kind of post-industrial distress that was attracting voters elsewhere to his flavour of populism — even as Janesville remained a Democratic-leaning union town.”…..
“Oregon is Facing Largest Energy Development Threat in Generations”
Max Wilbert writes about a massive offshore wind turbine project proposed off the coast of Oregon at
Biocentric with Max Wilbert
.The project will entail “dozens or hundreds of steel towers, each as tall as the Empire State Building, each floating on a steel platform the size of a baseball stadium and anchored to the sea floor with hundreds of miles of steel cables and chains as thick as a human body.”
Besides the environmental degradation required to produce the industrial inputs for the turbines, Wilbert notes that “the most terrifying possibility is that building these wind turbines to capture wind energy modifies ocean currents that drive the upwelling of nutrients….This is one reason why the Yurok Tribe, Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria, Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw, and the Tolowi Dee-ni’ Nation have passed resolutions opposing all offshore wind energy projects in Oregon and California, and why the National Congress of American Indians has called for a moratorium.”
The irony is that this massive turbine project is being justified in the name of stopping global warming, demonstrating the blinkered view of the trendy climate activist movement. Meanwhile, the crisis of the sea, documented in excruciating detail by coral reef ecologist Jeremy Jackson in his 2010 Ted Talk, “How We Wrecked the Ocean,” gets little if any media attention.
And,two items from media outlets, one in Egypt, one in Turkiye, about the major BRICS-Plus gathering in the Russian city of Nizhni-Novgord which started today. First, an overall look at this gathering of foreign ministers. By the way, Riley Waggaman posted late today an update about the St Petersburg International Economic Forum which i posted about in the 6/5/24 edition, i will discuss the update in the next edition.
BRICS Foreign Ministers meet in Russia amid shifting global order, Muhamed Samir, June 10, 2024.
Nizhny Novgorod – Foreign ministers from the expanded BRICS group of nations convened in Russia on Monday for a two-day meeting focused on current international relations, global governance reform, and conflict resolution. The meeting, chaired by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, is the first since the bloc expanded in 2023 to include Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Ethiopia. Representatives from additional “friends of BRICS” countries were also in attendance.
In his opening remarks, Lavrov highlighted the growing significance of BRICS in a changing world order. “The expansion of BRICS is a clear confirmation of the process of forming a multipolar world order,” he said, noting the increasing influence of Global South and East nations in global decision-making. Lavrov criticized what he described as Western attempts to maintain dominance and slow down the emergence of a multipolar system. He accused Western nations of using economic “weapons” like sanctions and financial pressure to influence the choices of sovereign states.
He contrasted this with the BRICS model of cooperation, which he characterized as based on principles of equality, mutual respect, openness, and consensus. “BRICS is driving forward the wind of change,” Lavrov asserted, emphasizing the group’s growing role in addressing global challenges. The meeting’s agenda includes discussions on international relations, strengthening the role of developing countries in global governance, conflict resolution, and collaboration in leading multilateral platforms. A separate session will be held with the participation of several Global South and East nations.
This gathering marks a significant step for the expanded BRICS group, which now represents a larger and more diverse coalition of countries seeking to shape the future of international relations and global governance.
And, one “friend of BRICS” and possible future member is Turkiye, a NATO member
Turkish foreign minister to attend BRICS+ meeting in Russia. Türkiye among 15 countries invited to meeting of foreign ministers of BRICS bloc in Nizhny Novgorod,Sumeyye Dilara Dincer, June 9, 2024.
Economic and trade cooperation is also on the agenda, including efforts to increase mutual investments and reach a $100-billion trade volume target, set by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
During the visit, Fidan [Hakan Fidan, the foreign minister] is also expected to meet with Turkish business representatives operating in Russia.
BRICS+ session
Tuesday's meeting will be addressing issues of international security, sustainable development, and global governance, with BRICS inviting 15 non-member countries to attend, Türkiye, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Algeria, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Cuba, Laos, Mauritania, Nigeria, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Venezuela, and Vietnam. [Sustainable Development is another name for Agenda 2030, UN SDGs, 4IR]
Fidan is also expected hold bilateral meetings with counterparts from other countries on the sidelines of the meeting. President Erdogan had also participated in the 10th BRICS Summit in Johannesburg in 2018.
Ending this segment and this edition, a video discussion about the article Craig McKee wrote for AE911Truth about the shift in the official narrative about “Conspiracy Theorists,” previously called crazy, to now calling them dangerous.
Are we dangerous??? AE911Truth Staff, 6/9/24,
Media rhetoric against 9/11 truth intensifies. Now YOU are a threat! Malcolm X once said: “The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.”
When it comes to 9/11 truth and the World Trade Center evidence, the media have pushed that power to its limits, actively covering up the crime of the century! In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by journalist Craig McKee to discuss his two most recent articles for AE911Truth. The first involves the editing out of explosions from the 2002 HBO documentary In Memoriam: New York City and AE911Truth’s attempt to reach out to the editors of the film to find out why this was done. The second article that Steele and McKee discuss not only shows how the term “conspiracy theory” has been used by the media to denigrate those who challenge the official 9/11 story but also how it has been further weaponized to label such challenges “dangerous” and “a threat to democracy.”
During the interview, Steele plays a clip from Fox News’s The Five in which the panelists attack the 9/11 Truth Movement, illustrating the very tactics that McKee’s second article exposes. Don’t miss this highly informative and entertaining interview! [Embedded video, an hour and 3 minutes]