Digital disembodiment. The following is a measure of how digitally disembodied this society and the people in it have become.
Celebrity actor Terrance Howard convinced Joe Rogan on Rogan’s show on 5/18/24 (EASY to find) that 1 times 1 = 2, thereby demonstrating that he’s a pioneering science genius and that he knows what he’s talking about regarding his contentions that infinite energy resources are around the corner and “we’re gonna kill gravity.” The Howard interview by Rogan was sent to me by a friend who was all jazzed because Howard was supposedly unveiling a new science, starting with 1 x 1 = 2 and going on to enunciate secret sources of vast energy around the corner which are being covered up in order to maintain the status quo, including how the likes of truth tellers like Howard will "kill gravity."
His argument? 1 times 1 is the same as 1 added to itself once. Hmm, that would be 1 +(1) =2, right? :-) So, per this logic,what's 3 times 5? Is it 3 + (3+3+3+3+3)? That’s 3 added to itself 5 times. That’s 18. The fact that this has any credibility shows just how disembodied are a large number of people.
If you think 3 x 5 = 15 only because we say so and think so, do this. Take a sheet of paper, cut 3 small squares out of it, place on a table. Do this a total of 5 times. Now count how many small squares you have on the table.:-)
And, let's try 5 x 3. Take the sheet, cut out 5 small squares, and do so two more times for a total of 3 times. How many squares on the table? I bet 15, just like 3 x 5. Using the Terrance Howard/Joe Rogan method, it should be 5 added to itself 3 times, so that's 5 +(5+5+5) which is ...20. So 5 x 3 is different from 3 x 5, eh? :-) So if you have 3 groups of mints, each with 5 mints, you really have 20? And if arranged as 5 groups with 3 mints each, you really have 18? People who think the Terrance Howard appearance showed a genius at work would probably have a hard time if someone were to place a paper bag over their heads. This idiocy thrives because.... we have come to tolerate it. This is a CON GAME, get it?!! And people are falling for it because they see in the conclusion something which they wanna hear, “solutions”!!
Biomedical. The startling meeting which Christine Massey monitored some two weeks ag in which Canadian officials openly discussed launching the next “pandemic” fear campaign, this time about Avian Flu. had been turned into video plus commentary by Dr Sam Bailey. This comes as i’m noticing a large ramp-up in the number of people wearing masks, with one store i got to now apparently requiring all its employees to wear them.
Dr Sam Bailey, 5/21/24. 20 minutes.
In our book Virus Mania, we called Chapter 7: “H5N1: Avian Flu and Not a Glimmer of Proof” and exposed the foundational fraud behind the attempts to convince the public that there was a deadly new influenza “virus”. We suspected the narrative would be used again which is why we featured it on the cover of the 2021 edition. Sure enough, in 2023 the ‘bird flu’ was being used once more as the excuse to carry out the mass culling of poultry as I covered that year in “Taking Away Your Chickens”.
In recent weeks, the public “health” agencies and mainstream media have been featuring ‘H5N1’ in the headlines and “messaging” to the public that a pandemic could be about to start. As expected, some of the alleged experts have started flapping their wings about “pandemic preparedness” plans. There is also an additional angle in that they are claiming to find the influenza “virus” in milk which appears to be a new weapon in the war against raw milk and unpasteurised products.
By a stroke of luck, or more precisely through bureaucratic bungling, private researcher and biostatistician Christine Massey received a surprise invitation to an online H5N1 roundtable meeting headed by Theresa Tam, the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada. This enabled us to secure exclusive footage of how they are rolling out the surveillance program and the virological pseudoscience that underpins the entire fraud. You will need to watch the video to fully appreciate the absurd level of nonsense coming from some of the key enablers in this brewing swindle… [References with links]
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, May 21·
Stunning how over the last week, workers at the natural food store in Berkeley where i shop every week, which sells raw milk, BTW, have all put masks back on, even though there are no mandates to do so, either by the city, the state of California, or the US government. Word of the avian flu scare must be getting around. This is what happens and will keep happening if the entire virus/contagion fraud paradigm is not confronted and revealed. Thanks a bunch, Sam, and great work on Christine Massey's part capturing all this.
And, Dawn Lester discusses another current big biomedical media story.
Dawn Lester, 5/21/24.
I have been contemplating this story for a some time now and wondering whether to write about it because it is such an emotionally charged topic. But I can’t worry about sparing people’s feelings when what we’re being told is not true. So, here goes! The basic narrative is explained in a BBC article entitled What is the infected blood scandal and will victims get compensation? “More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C after being given contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s.”
This ‘scandal’ is being referred to as ‘the biggest treatment disaster in NHS history’. Under the heading, Who was affected by the infected blood scandal and how many patients were involved? the article explains that it involved two main groups of patients: “Firstly, haemophiliacs - and those with similar disorders - who have a rare genetic condition which means their blood does not clot properly.” And “A second group of patients was given a contaminated blood transfusion after childbirth, surgery or other medical treatment between 1970 and 1991.”
The 2 key messages are that, “The inquiry estimates between 80 and 100 were infected with HIV, and about 27,000 with Hepatitis C.” And, “In total, it's thought about 2,900 people have died as a result of the scandal.”
The article refers to the use of ‘donated human blood plasma’ and asserts that, “…whole batches were contaminated with deadly viruses.” This statement identifies the underlying problem that I take issue with in this ‘story’, because, as I and others have discovered over the course of many years of research, the claim about ‘deadly viruses’ remains utterly unproven.
I must emphasise here that I am not denying that people have been harmed and that some have died. What I am asserting is that these health problems and deaths were not caused by any ‘infection’ with any ‘virus’, whether it’s called HIV or Hepatitis C. If you are not familiar with my work, here’s a useful background article based on information discussed in What Really Makes You Ill? The Germ Theory: A Deadly Fallacy[Screen shot, link, 6/29/22]
I would add that this ‘scandal’ highlights yet another reason that the ‘no virus’ position is of such importance and cannot be dismissed as a ‘psy-op’, as many people still seem to be asserting. I discuss this point in another of my articles, No, it isn't a psyop! [Screen shot, link, 12/9/23]
What I find really sad is that the people said to be affected by the ‘scandal’ are described as ‘victims’ and made to be fearful for their health and their lives as the result of an alleged ‘infection’; a claim for which there is zero evidence.
I realise, of course, that this article is going to be extremely unpopular with anyone who has been told they’re affected by the scandal and are due compensation. They really will not appreciate being told they have nothing to worry about as far as ‘deadly viruses’ are concerned - although I have to add that I think it is highly unlikely that any of them will read this article.
What is upsetting for me is that it is also highly unlikely that these people will ever find out what really happened and whether their health has actually been compromised. Unfortunately, as I have also discussed in previous articles, the power of the mind is undeniable and profound; a belief in ‘infections’ with ‘deadly viruses’ has the ability to cause real health problems for people. The perpetuation of belief in the ‘germ theory’ seems to be one of the key underlying purposes of the persistent and fervent reporting in the media of such stories, but this theory has no basis in truth.
The consequence of this dogmatic focus of attention on ‘germs’, and ‘viruses’ in particular with respect to the contaminated blood story, is the inevitable failure to conduct an unbiased investigation into the real nature of the donated blood plasma to discover whether it contained any genuinely hazardous materials, and if so, the recipients would indeed be due compensation.
The Report into the ‘scandal’ was published on 20th May 2024. I have not read it and, to be honest, I’m not sure if I will or if I could without being incensed by its claims about allegedly ‘dangerous viruses’. According to the BBC article At a glance: Infected blood inquiry’s key findings, one of the key findings of the enquiry is that patients were exposed to ‘unacceptable risks’ because the blood and blood products were not adequately screened for ‘dangerous viruses’.
I must emphasise again that I am not saying there were no risks, but any real risks that may have existed were not as reported. The main controversy in the minds of the general public, as well as those who are said to have been affected, whether directly or indirectly, is with respect to the ‘compensation’ and the question of why it took so long for this ‘scandal’ to come to light. However, despite the ‘findings’ of the enquiry appearing to have provided answers to these questions, there remains one vitally important unanswered question, which is: What was the real source(s) of contamination of the blood and blood products?
Ancillary but equally important questions that this raises are: Will anyone ever demand an investigation to uncover what really happened? Will a genuine investigation be conducted, one that ignores any alleged ‘virus’? I would like to think that would be the case, but I am not holding my breath. When ‘germs’ stop being viewed as the ‘bad guys’, then maybe, just maybe, someone might suggest that this ‘scandal’ should be re-visited.
4IR. What’s Left? Looks at the matter of maintaining mental health in this society and whether therapy administered by licensed professionals can be beneficial. Two of the participants say it can be, one doesn’t have much kind stuff to say about it. all agree the real source of mental health problems is not the individuals, but the society they have to function in.
Therapy? Are You Crazy?!?! What’s Left? 5/18/24, an hour and 41 minutes. What’s Left? this week is Eduardo Abarca, Andy Libson and Jessica Holmes!.
"Therapy. To do or not to do? That is the question. Some of us have gone through therapy, others are considering it. On today's episod.. we take up the question and try to share from personal perspectives if we think it is helpful or not. Check us out.” [Links]
My comments. at the You Tube and Andy’s FB pages.
Thanks, Andy, Don Eduardo, and JESSICA! You look great, BTW.
A lot to say, will try to make it as brief as possible. I totally agree that the therapy *industry* is worse than useless, it is harmful, intended to take people with psyches broken by living within capitalism and "fix" them enough so as to fit them back onto the production line, either the one at work/school or the bigger social one. The use of drugs in this context is absolutely atrocious. BUT, there is an alternative history, the one of radical therapy.
Freud, you might say the father of mental therapy, admitted many times that the ultimate cause of mental problems was capitalist society itself. But he increasingly shrugged and asserted there is nothing else to do except to help people adjust to that which was destroying them. However, his (most likely) closest associate, Wilhelm Reich, strongly disagreed with him about that turn, and consequently broke completely with Freud, making his reason explicit. He practiced therapy which aimed to expose to the patient the social problems which were the core reasons for the ailment of patients. He identified the sexual repression practiced by capitalist society as something which needed to be undermined and overthrown in order to both solve individuals' problems as well as to enable a general social revolution.
For a good succinct summary of Reich's views, see The Irrational in Politics by Maurice Brinton, 1975. I also recommend Sex Pol and Other Essays by Reich. He was consequently expelled from both the Communist Party as well as the therapy industry! He was to flee Nazi Germany and move to the US, where he increasingly went off on weird tangents, in part to deflect attempts to persecute him for his political views, but was still persecuted, his books burned!
There has been a whole succession of therapists who have come upon Reich's work and tried to incorporate his ideas into their practices and analyses, with a variety of success. I sort of came across one by accident. When my marriage was breaking up in Sept 1991, my then-wife, who was seeing a counselor, got a referral from her to a couples therapist, whom we started seeing. Our first meeting, she informed him and me that the next day she was moving out of the place we had . For the next several weeks, she kept dropping a bomb every session, including her filing for divorce and moving to Southern California, where she grew up, where her high school boyfriend, newly reconnected, was living. I kept going to this therapist on my own, he was OK with it. Later on, he told me he felt like she never intended to actually go through couples therapy, just dumped me on him and said "good luck.”
Seeing him was useful to me to a a big extent. He thought it was a good thing that i had been recording dreams for many years, and had me share ones i thought were significant, using them to point out just how much self-repression i had been doing since childhood, fitting in with my parents' mores, and really stepping it up as a teenager, high school and then college years, deferring that side of my life till i was to graduate and then have time for such "stuff." Reality is, once repression is practiced, it is difficult to undo, and gets more and more so as you age. Breaking through on the cultural and political front enabled me eventually to start dealing with the repression, but a lot of it remained in my inner mental core. And he was able to point out in instances where this was true.
I had someone who'd listen to me and point out facts, at a time when my friends were all preoccupied and when the society i emerged into as newly single was becoming very repressive about sexuality as a result of the fake AIDS "pandemic" (the disease was/is real, the alleged viral/pandemic aspect completely bogus) and a general conservative trend, not to mention that i was 44, facing peers who were increasingly not into alternative lifestyles. I even became aware of the fact that i had been physically abused the last few years of the marriage, and continually abused psychologically, not even being able to be friends with other women (the ones she deemed attractive, anyway, unless they were coupled). After 5 years or so, there was little more i could get out of the therapy, so our sessions came to an end. I'm not at all regretful of engaging in that therapy. He never suggested drugs, in fact he was even OK with some of my...... explorations, many a therapist would have reported me. This radical side of therapy/counseling was not explored by any of you, unfortunately.
And, in a major development earlier today regarding the on-going Israeli genocide of Palestinians.
Norway, Ireland, Spain to recognise Palestinian state, The three European countries will formally enact recognition on May 28 despite Israel’s warnings of the consequences. Al Jazeera Staff, 5/22/24.
The leaders of Norway, Ireland and Spain have said their countries will formally recognise Palestine as a state next week for the sake of “peace in the Middle East“, prompting Israel to immediately recall its envoys. Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said on Wednesday that a two-state solution was in Israel’s best interest and the recognition of Palestinian statehood would come as of May 28. “There cannot be peace in the Middle East if there is no recognition,” he said in Oslo.
[NOTE: The large majority of governments around the world have already done this, including those of China, India and Russia. Europe’s states and the English speaking nations are a small holdout group.]
Ireland’s prime minister Simon Harris made a similar announcement in Dublin, as did Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez in Madrid, to applause in parliament. “In the midst of a war, with tens of thousands killed and injured [in Gaza], we must keep alive the only alternative that offers a political solution for Israelis and Palestinians alike: Two states, living side by side, in peace and security,” Gahr Store said. “Recognition of Palestine is a means of supporting the moderate forces which have been losing ground in this protracted and brutal conflict,” he said. Harris told a news conference: “I’m confident that further countries will join us in taking this important step in the coming weeks.”
Ireland’s foreign minister Micheal Martin said on X that the recognition will take place on May 28. Sanchez, while announcing that Spain’s council of ministers would also recognise an independent Palestinian state on May 28, accused his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu of putting the two-state solution in “danger” with his policy of “pain and destruction” in Gaza. “We hope that our recognition and our reasons contribute to other Western countries to follow this path, because the more we are, the more strength we will have to impose a ceasefire,” Sanchez said.
Harris also said that Ireland was unequivocal in recognising Israel’s right to exist “securely and in peace with its neighbours”, and called for all captives in Gaza to be immediately returned. “But let me also be clear, Hamas is not the Palestinian people … a two-state solution is the only way out of the generational cycles of violence, retaliation and resentment,” he added.
At least 35,709 people have been killed and 79,990 wounded in Israeli attacks on Gaza since October 7. The death toll in Israel from Hamas’s October 7 attack is 1,139, with dozens still held captive.[Some of this toll has in fact been demonstrated to be the result of Israel forces firing on groups of captives mingled with Palestinian fighters.]
Al Jazeera’s Imran Khan, reporting from Amman, Jordan, because Israel’s government has banned Al Jazeera, said that Malta and Slovenia were also expected to make similar announcements. “This is a momentous occasion for the Palestinians,” he said. “It’s perhaps unsurprising that Norway has taken the lead on this because they were behind the Oslo Accords – the agreement in 1993 that really did two things: it recognised the Palestine Liberation Organization, the PLO, as the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people,” Khan added.
The timing of the move comes amid heightened international pressure on Israel. Just this week, the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Kharim Khan announced that he was seeking an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, among others, and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hears on South Africa’s request for a ruling to stop the Israeli offensive in Rafah, southern Gaza.
Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey welcomed the three leaders’ decision. France said now was not the right moment, but added that recognition was not “taboo”. Meanwhile, the White House acknowledged that each country can make its own decision on whether to recognise a Palestinian state, but stressed that US President Joe Biden thinks direct negotiations by the parties is the best approach.
Reporting from Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, Al Jazeera’s Nida Ibrahim said it is seen as a great step, on paper, “that is very much welcomed on the street”. “However, great diplomatic moves won’t change the reality for Palestinians on the ground” amid intensifying Israeli attacks, Ibrahim said. “If we take Jenin, for example, in the north of the occupied West Bank, it is suffering the repercussions of a second day of an Israeli raid.”
Israel immediately announced it was recalling its envoys to Ireland and Norway for “urgent consultations”.“Today, I am sending a sharp message to Ireland and Norway: Israel will not go over this in silence,” Foreign Minister Israel Katz said in a statement, adding that he planned to do the same with the Spanish ambassador.The Israeli foreign ministry had earlier posted a video message addressed to Ireland on X warning that “recognising a Palestinian state risks turning you into a pawn in the hands of Iran and Hamas”, adding the move would “only fuel extremism and instability”. Israel has said plans for Palestinian recognition constitute a “prize for terrorism” that would reduce the chances of a negotiated resolution to the war in Gaza, which began on October 7 when Hamas fighters stormed into southern Israel.
Hussein al-Sheikh, the secretary-general of the executive committee of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), posted on X: “Historical moments in which the free world triumphs for truth and justice after long decades of Palestinian national struggle, suffering, pain, occupation, racism, murder, oppression, abuse and destruction to which the people of Palestine were subjected.”Hamas called the decision by the three countries an “important step”.
Palestinian politician Mustafa Barghouti said it was a “powerful political and symbolically significant step” that moved the achievement of “freedom and justice” closer for the Palestinian people. “This is also a blow to Netanyahu and his extreme government, and to the fascists in his government … It means the acts of fascism and extremism in the Israeli government has no future,” he told Al Jazeera.
And, Electronic Intifada’s weekly news show. I’ve watched about half way through.
Breaking news and analysis on day 229 of Gaza's Al-Aqsa Flood | The Electronic Intifada Podcast, 5/22/24. Three hours and 10 minutes.
00:00 Introduction
01:06 Nora Barrows-Friedman delivers news report on Gaza and West Bank
23:13 Discussion on International Criminal Court developments
01:07:50 Jon Elmer analyzes videos from resistance in Gaza and Lebanon
02:52:27 Group discussion
My comments. Gruesome news about Israeli forces attacking health care facilities, by bombing, shelling, and direct attacks by ground forces. A Canadian doctor provides one account. The number of people who are on the move is up 10 over 900,000, over 800,000 of whom were staying in "safe" Rafah, have to move yet again. The ICC prosecutor is pursuing a very limited and narrow case against Israeli leaders, totally leaving out pre October 7 actions, and is actually disproportionally going after the Hamas leaders, one of whom, Haniya, has not even been in Gaza during the time starting on October 7. Nevertheless, the action has drawn the extreme ire of the US government, with Biden and people in both houses of Congress, from both parties, are talking about punitive steps to take against the ICC..
Ending this segment and this edition, two items about 9/11, both by Craig McKee.
Craig McKee, 5/22/24.
In this installment of Truth and Shadows Adam Ruff and I are joined by former AE911Truth chief operating officer Kelly David to discuss the hugely important stance taken by forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht that the “commingling” of human remains from the World Trade Center could only have been the result of explosions, not crushing.
Wecht, who passed away on May 13 at the age of 93, made the statements during an interview for the AE911Truth documentary The Unspeakable. In our discussion, Adam, Kelly, and I discuss Wecht’s legacy and how valuable his look at the controlled demolition evidence was.
Here is the article I just posted on Thought Crimes and Misdemeanors about Wecht’s involvement in The Unspeakable. The article has previously been posted on the AE911Truth website.[Link]See next item right below.]
And here is the entire film, directed by Dylan Avery and conceived by AE911Truth:[Embedded video]
My comment at the page.
Co-mingling of tissues of separate people due to explosions, wow! But also a reminder of Bobby McIlwaine' s face being blown off BEFORE any of the collapses. I wonder how many times people who are informed of this will keep insisting that this was because of buildings crashing on top of him, ignoring the fact that his body was removed before the collapses.
And, the article McKee wrote which was posted at AE911Truth.
Wecht, who appeared in AE911Truth's The Unspeakable, said that the evidence he saw supported the position that explosions caused 'commingling' of bones and tissue. Craig McKee, 5/14/24.
With the news that legendary forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht has passed away at 93, I thought it would be appropriate to repost an article I wrote for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth on December 20, 2021. In his interview for The Unspeakable, Wecht backs up the AE911Truth position that explosives brought the towers down.
Cyril Wecht is not intimidated by power. He doesn’t shy away from taking unpopular positions or challenging official narratives. While other public figures often calculate their statements and tailor their principles for personal gain, Wecht asks himself one thing: “What is the evidence telling me?”
In his more than six decades as a forensic pathologist, the now 90-year-old Wecht has been asked to weigh in on some of the most notorious deaths of our time. Among them: John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Elvis Presley, Sharon Tate, Nicole Brown Simpson, Vince Foster, Sunny von Bulow, Mary Jo Kopecne, JonBenet Ramsey, and Kurt Cobain.
Wecht appeared on the cover of The New York Times in 1972, revealing that President Kennedy’s brain had gone missing. He later testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations and advised Oliver Stone on the film JFK. He is famous for his contention that the three shots Lee Harvey Oswald is alleged to have fired from the Texas School Book Depository could not have been discharged in the window of time available. He lent his expertise to the documentary Soaked in Bleach, which alleges that Kurt Cobain did not commit suicide but was murdered, and his work on concussions was portrayed in the feature film Concussion, starring Will Smith.
When he is not working on high-profile, controversial cases, Wecht — who is also a lawyer, university professor, and medical-legal forensic science consultant — is busy performing and supervising autopsies (more than 61,000 over his career). He has served in the most distinguished positions in his field (currently clinical professor at the University of Pittsburgh and formerly president of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences and the American College of Legal Medicine). And he has written several books — notably, Cause of Death, Grave Secrets, and The Life and Deaths of Cyril Wecht: Memoirs of America’s Most Controversial Forensic Pathologist.
Now, thanks to Kelly David and Dylan Avery, producer and director respectively of the new Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth documentary The Unspeakable, Wecht is listening to what the evidence has to say about the deaths of approximately 2,600 people in New York City on September 11, 2001. Cyril Wecht is interviewed in the latter part of AE911Truth’s new film The Unspeakable. This video is cued up to his first appearance in the film.[Video]
In his interview for the film, Wecht lends support to the position that the deaths of Bobby McIlvaine and Geoff Campbell — who were both killed at the World Trade Center on 9/11 — were caused by explosions, not by crushing from gravitational building collapses. He also surmises that the deaths of more than 1,000 victims who have been identified through DNA from bone fragments and soft tissue — and by extension the 1,106 victims who, remarkably, have still not been identified — are also better explained by the explosive destruction of the buildings.
Wecht is now so intrigued by the case for controlled demolition that he is studying the issue in depth. He is in regular contact with David, who is AE911Truth’s chief operating officer, seeking material from the organization so that he has all of the available evidence. Once he has gathered enough information, he intends to give presentations on the subject, just as he did with the JFK assassination. To have an expert of Wecht’s stature challenging the official story of what destroyed the WTC towers is a major development for the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Getting Wecht to agree to be in The Unspeakable took a leap of faith for David and Avery. As they were wrapping up shooting on the film in early August 2021, they still hoped to find a forensic pathologist to assess the evidence relating to the McIlvaine and Campbell deaths — and thus answer some of the questions the bereaved family members had been asking for years, as documented in the film.
Part of that evidence was contained in a paper titled “Human Identification Following the World Trade Center Disaster: Assessing Management Practices for Highly Fragmented and Commingled Human Remains.” Its author, Amy Mundorff, had herself barely survived the destruction of the World Trade Center while she was working for New York City’s Office of Chief Medical Examiner. Mundorff’s paper chronicles the OCME’s painstaking process of identifying 9/11 victims from the 21,905 human remains that were collected — a process that continues to this day…….[SNIP]…..
In her report, which Wecht quotes from on camera, Mundorff writes:
“Medical examiner personnel were initially caught off guard by the degree of destruction and fragmentation of the recovered human remains. . . . The tidal wave of debris that carried human remains blocks away, depositing them, in some cases, on top of buildings, also fused soft tissue to bone fragments from multiple individuals so completely that the remains appeared to be from the same individual. That's how commingled they were.” Wecht remarks in the film that, for this commingling to take place, remains had to have been propelled with tremendous force, something that wouldn’t occur in a gravitational collapse. [Such a collapse cannot result in LATERAL motion, only downward motion, let alone motion over distances.]
“That’s not going to happen from crushing,” he says. “A building collapses, and two or more people are crushed. I can’t envision a situation in which the soft tissue of one victim is hurled with such force as to be embedded in, attached to, a bony fragment of another victim. I can’t envision that.” In fact, this commingling phenomenon occurred with the remains of Geoff Campbell, whose brother Matt has been working for the last several years to open a new inquest into Geoff’s death so that evidence not considered originally — namely, the evidence for controlled demolition of the Twin Towers — can be examined as the possible cause of death. The decision on whether to grant the request rests with the attorney general for England and Wales. In the meantime, the Campbell family can only wait…….
Bob McIlvaine, Bobby’s father, learned the details of his son’s death only in 2006 or 2007, when he met for the first time with the doctor who performed the examination of Bobby’s body. The wounds described by the doctor indicated that Bobby had been hit by flying glass from some kind of massive blast. Most of Bobby’s head and face down to his lower jaw bone were missing, as was his right arm. He also had lacerations all over his chest from flying glass as well as fractures in his ankles and post-mortem burns.
When Wecht reviewed the Bobby McIlvaine documents on camera and learned that Bobby had apparently died as he was entering the lobby around the time the North Tower was struck, he had no trouble drawing a conclusion: “Then it had to be from some kind of explosive effect.” It will be fascinating to see what Wecht does once he finishes examining all of the evidence. Based on his fearless and prolific career, one would expect that his research will be followed by action.