Biomedical. A new documentary about Love Canal, discussed by Eric Francis Coppolino, who got his start as an investigative reporter specializing in chemical industry fraud dealing with a late chapter of the Love Canal story, in September 1983, when he was 19 and the editor of a student magazine at SUNY-Buffalo.
Events in a Western New York neighborhood built on a toxic waste dump are presented with impeccable accuracy, balance and impact, directed by Jamila Ephron for PBS. Eric Francis Coppolino, 4/22/24.
[Audio file, 31 minutes]
Premiers on PBS nationwide at 9 pm EDT on Monday, April 22. It will be broadcast and also streamed live from your local PBS station’s app or website. Official trailer is posted below. Watch Chapter 1.
Dear Friend and Reader:
When I was working on my photo series on Love Canal last autumn, I learned that PBS would be releasing a documentary about it in the spring of 2024. I was skeptical, though Luella Kenney, a former Love Canal resident and my interview subject, was excited about it. Incredible as it is to consider, two elementary schools and sprawling suburban neighborhood were built on and around a chemical and nuclear dump filled with 20,000 tons of extremely toxic waste, populated from the late 1950s into the mid-1970s.
On Top of the News for Years
The resulting disaster was at the top of national news for years, from the spring of 1977 into 1980. The incident led to the creation of the Superfund, and the emergence of an environmental movement centered on dioxin. Many people were sickened, one child died from exposure to contamination from playing in his backyard, and thousands of lives were disrupted. Today I attended a screening of the documentary, Poisoned Ground: The Tragedy at Love Canal, at the New York State Museum in Albany. It was the first independent effort as director/producer for its filmmaker, Jamila Ephron.
This is an outstanding work of documentary film-making and conveys what really happened at Love Canal and how it fits into the larger chemical waste problem in American society. The audio above is the Q&A session after the screening. It’s not especially good audio but should be listenable. There have been many tellings of the events of Love Canal, though Poisoned Ground excels in several ways. First, the scope of archival research is impressive, gathering local and national television footage, as well as scenes from the attempted remediation of the waste dump.
Second, it’s the first telling of events that documents matters of race and class. There were really two Love Canal neighborhoods: a working- and middle-class area east of 96th St., comprising mostly of Caucasian families in suburban homes; and a low-income apartment complex called Griffon Manner, populated by mostly African-American families. This is the first I’ve ever heard of the details of the racial angle, or seen interviews with community leaders at Griffon Manor.
Third, Ephron treats the government leaders who bungled the cleanup with humanity and compassion, making the point that their incompetence partly involved the total lack of experience with such a disaster or confrontation. You get a sense of who they are without judgment or derision.
Documenting the Impact of Television
Finally, she masterfully documents the impact of television, and how well Love Canal residents (most of whom were only high school educated) caught onto how to use this powerful medium to build public support and move the government to act. I learned about many facets of the situation I had never heard of or did not remember, including how the attempt at a cleanup of the dumpsite — with most of the residents still there — spread contamination and sickened people from exposure.
Ephron is excellent at pacing the film in such a way that you can feel how many events were compressed into less than four years. I’ve visited Love Canal four times, written about it several times over the years, interviewed survivors and taken many photos. Poisoned Ground left me feeling like I had witnessed the events for the first time. If all goes well, Ephron will be my guest Friday night on Planet Waves FM.
Catch you then. With love,
And, Coppolino has a sort-of-new piece about the 40th anniversary of the press conference which marked the start of the AIDS so-called-pandemic. The interview was run (but as an audio) as part of the program broadcast on 4/7/24, see the first edition of LT which followed that date.
Not a milligram of ink had been used on a scientific paper about a virus said to be causing numerous preexisting diseases. But they called it HTLV III, and later, HIV or the "AIDS virus.” Eric Francis Coppolino, 4/22/24.
[Embedded video, an hour and 6 minutes]
Dear Friend and Reader:
When Margaret Heckler of the Department of Health and Human Service held a press conference on April 23, 1984 announcing “the probable cause of AIDS,” they had no actual reason to suspect that it was caused by a virus. Well, there was also no “it.” AIDS was a construction; an invented syndrome, not an observed one. With her was Dr. Robert Gallo, who fraudulently stole his “discovery” from the Pasteur Institute in France, which had also not discovered it.
In the wings, out of sight, was Dr. Anthony Fauci, who would soon emerge as the AIDS Czar of the Reagan administration — ending his career as Trump’s and Biden’s Covid Czar.
Perfect Accuracy Promised. False Positives Delivered.
At the April 1984 press conference, Heckler and Gallo also claim to have a test that could “diagnose” the infection with nearly 100% accuracy, which will really turn out to have nearly 100 sources of false positive results — wrecking many lives in the process. For decades, being “HIV positive” was considered a death sentence. Gallo co-owned the patent, and would go on to make millions of dollars on it.
Under the HIV=AIDS theory rolled out that day, numerous preexisting diseases were said to be part of the same thing, all mysteriously caused by men having sex with one another. The problem was blamed on a phantom — HTLV III (the alleged “Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 3,” which had never once caused a case of leukemia). Not only was it out of work and looking for a job, it had never been isolated. Anyone who thinks it has been is welcome to provide the isolation paper.
The eew factor of male/male sex (i.e., sin) was turned into a valuable commodity that would soon be traded on the stock market in the form of companies making “antiviral medications.”
Hangover from the Failed ‘War on Cancer’
As for the alleged leukemia virus: Pres. Nixon’s “War on Cancer,” a $1.6 billion dollar effort commenced by the National Cancer Act of 1971, was the search for a presumed cancer virus (heck, it seemed like a good idea). And 12 years later, that “war” had failed to accomplish any such thing. As business and grant opportunities in virology were evaporating, the notion of a “cancer virus” found new life in what was falsely claimed to be “cancer of the T-cell,” a type of immune cell that was claimed (again, falsely) to be killed by the apparition and therefore able to cause what would later be claimed were 29 distinct, preexisting diseases. That is what became “AIDS” — the acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
And, despite the lack of any evidence, belief in this idea was mandatory. So, too, was the ban on funding the search for any other cause for why gay men were getting sick. As a result, the world population was gradually inflicted with terror about sex, the nascent sexual revolution was crushed, and anyone who so much as questioned this narrative was branded an “AIDS denialist.” But this is not a matter of denial; it’s a matter of “show me your data.”
None of this was true, or scientifically documented. But it rapidly became “the one truth and the only truth” in the minds of nearly everyone. When Heckler took the podium and announced that “the probable cause of AIDS has been found,” she had no scientific basis whatsoever to make the statement. There was no evidence of a virus; there was no proof of spread of a virus; there was no demonstration that the virus could kill a T-cell or cause a disease. There still is none.
The Beginning of a Massive Industry
But a massive industry based on false testing, treatment and prevention was created. And this same basic model: declare the existence of a virus, then mount a useless, expensive international response, became the public health model we live with today. Forget about the toxic waste in our neighborhoods and in our food. Forget the illnesses caused by the 6.3 billion prescriptions filled and consumed every year in the United States (as of 2020, that’s 19 prescriptions every year per person, on average). One-third of Americans do not use any prescription drugs, so those who take them actually eat 30 prescriptions a year.
They all have “side” effects, many of which require other drugs to mitigate. And don’t forget the toxic, pretend food consumed by much of the country. None of this matters. No, every disease is caused by a virus. The world has no other problems.
My Guest is Dr. Rebecca Culshaw Smith
In a special edition of Planet Waves TV/FM, I go over this history with someone I consider to be the running with the torch on the HIV/AIDS issue: Rebecca Culshaw Smith, author of The Real AIDS Epidemic Substack and a book by the same title. Rebecca was recently a guest on the Sam Bailey channel. Rebecca is a mathematical biologist, whose work veered into the HIV/AIDS issue during her masters degree work in the late 1990s. She has an MSc in mathematics, University, Halifax NS, Canada.
She earned her Ph.D. in mathematics in 2002 at the same institution. Her dissertation was titled, “Immune Response Models of HIV Infection and Treatment.” She has held several teaching posts, including at Clarke University (in Iowa) and University of Texas — and is a frequent guest on Planet Waves FM.
Note to readers, I am not merely taking Rebecca’s word for what she says. We discuss these issues ongoing, and I’ve checked her work carefully.
I’ve also worked on the HIV/AIDS issue in-depth since 1992 — and her findings comport with my own, as well as those of Drs. Mark and Sam Bailey in New Zealand, the Perth Group in Australia, Dr Peter Duesberg, Celia Farber, Dr. David Rasnick, Dr. Kevin Corbett in the U.K. and many other credible investigators, most of whom I’ve interviewed personally.
I suggest you read the transcript below for yourself. It will be better if you print it out, so you can mark your pages and take full possession of the document. Post any questions you have in the comments. Rebecca will be available to respond as well.
With love,
Additional Resources [LINKS]
Transcript of the April 23, 1984 press conference
Full Video of the press conference
Other historic videos
— Additional research: Cindy Tice Ragusa
4IR. What’s Left? looks at the escalating confrontation between the state apparatuses of Iran and Israel.
Rung By Rung Up the Escalation Ladder. What’s Left? 4/20/24, an hour and 16 minutes.
"Today we reflect on Iran's recent retaliation on Israel. What does it mean in the midst of other strategic wars going on? World War III? Take a dive with us.”
My comments.
Thanks, Don Eduardo, Kenny and Andy.
Several things were said which i disagree with. But i wanna start with a major key agreement, two things Andy said. I totally agree that if "you" (abstract) are willing to support the system as a consequence of a (supposed) nuclear attack in the US or Europe, "you" will be getting played. Because a nuclear false flag is quite likely in the near future. This has been discussed in 9/11 truth circles since the time soon after 9/11, with William Perry, "Defense" Sec under Clinton, and Ashton Carter, "Defense" Sec under Obama (his last couple of years) co-writing a piece about "nuclear terrorism" in 2007.
Carter co-wrote an article in Foreign Affairs in 1998 practically predicting 9/11.
And i also agree that a nuclear war scenario is not gonna be stopped short of a revolutionary transformation, which would have to be global. The inexorable trend toward a global nuclear war is an expression of one of the two fundamental dynamics of capital, the one toward competition and atomizing. I agree that Jake Klyzcek fails to grasp this. On the other hand, i think you, Kenny and Edwardo tend to overlook the other fundamental dynamic of capital, the one toward centralization and concentration, which the effort to create global digital panopticon is a key expression of, something which Jake does grok.
The Israeli attack on Isfahan you kept reporting on as breaking news turned out to be largely a feint, Iranian forces shot down 3 drones, little if any damage. So it looks like the Israeli government did for now go with the US pressure to keep things contained. And within the last couple of days, Ukrainian forces for the first time shot down a Russian bomber, the mainstay of the Russian air force in terms of such aircraft. And China's economic apparatus has not remotely decoupled from either the US or the West as a whole. Russia and China both continue to fully cooperate with the WHO and with global financial institutions in pushing the 4IR, as are the rest of the BRICS-plus powers.
Something that came to mind as i was listening to you all describing your feelings as the Iranian drones and missiles were slowly making their way toward Israel. On 10/22/1962, i was sitting in study hall in high school (a sophomore), 4 days after the Cuban Missile Crisis had begun. Everyone i knew had been on edge the whole time. And the school intercom came on to announce that a group of Soviet ships were sailing toward Cuba, daring the US ships enforcing an embargo to do something. "Here we go" was the feeling. Suspended animation for about 20 minutes. And then, news that the ships had turned around. Days later, an agreement was announced, the USSR would pull its missiles out of Cuba, while the US would remove missiles in Italy and Turkey which were slated to be removed soon anyway, rendered obsolete by new technology. This was NOT JFK being the “man of peace” being sold by the RFK Jr campaign nowadays, but a case of a US power play, playing chicken with nukes, forcing the Soviet state to back down.
And, Riley Waggaman reports as Putin prepares for a new term as president of Russia.
Fingers crossed? Edward Slavsquat. 4/21/24.
…..
To Putin’s credit, his current cabinet is already packed with absolute legends. Just a few minor tweaks are needed and the Russian government will finally be ready to deploy the gold-backed ruble. There are around 30 members of the cabinet, so unfortunately we won’t have time to heap praise on each and every minister.
But allow me to list a few ministers who Putin MUST KEEP in his cabinet in order to ensure the success of the Multipolar World Order:
Minister of Health Mikhail Murashko: Murashko presided over the largest loss of Russian life since the end of the Great Patriotic War, and also championed a life-saving untested genetic AstraZeneca knock-off for people of all sizes, including pregnant women and children.[Screen shots] Murashko’s feats of public health are so numerous and health-preserving that it would require five or six blog posts just to summarize them. Needless to say, Mikhail is a favorite of this blog, and if you want to learn more about him you can consult the Edward Slavsquat search bar.[Screen shot] Murashko is a national treasure and let’s hope that Putin keeps him in the starting lineup.
Deputy Prime Minister for Social Policy Tatyana Golikova: Like many of her esteemed colleagues, Golikova has been bouncing around various government departments and ministries since the early 90s. With a solid track record of non-stop failure, Golikova is also the lucky wife of Viktor Khristenko, a former minister of Energy and Trade who is linked to various pharmaceutical scams—from “swine flu” pills to Sputnik V. A formidable and endearing power couple. Russia’s social policy is in safe hands.[Screen shot, link, blog entry, June ’22]
Golikova has also played an instrumental role in the creation of Russia’s much-admired Sanitary Shield, a biosecurity program that will use PCR tests and genetic vaccines to keep the country safe and healthy when the next pandemic arrives—which Golikova says is inevitable. No Russian cabinet is complete without Tatyana Golikova and it would be horrific if Putin were to exclude such a selfless public servant from his 2024 All-Star Team.[Photo]
Finance Minister Anton Siluanov: Siluanov wants the entire world to adopt Russia’s Sanitary Shield program, which means that even if you don’t live in Russia you should be rooting for Siluanov’s cabinet reappointment because Anton wants to use PCR tests and genetic vaccines to protect you from bio-harm.[Screen shot] You might be wondering why Russia’s finance minister takes such keen interest in “reforming the global healthcare system”. It’s because Anton Siluanov likes to involve himself in all sorts of monkey business. As Katyusha dot org reported in November 2022, Siluanov has a penchant for “betraying national interests and swearing allegiance to {the} unipolar world of globalists, where directives to states are issued by dubious supranational organizations.” It should surprise no one that Siluanov has been dutifully serving Russia in some official capacity since the late 90s. It would be very rude to kick him out of the cabinet now. Hopefully Putin sticks with this winner.
Minister of Digital Development Maksut Shadayev: If it’s digital, or if it’s being “digitalized”, Maksut probably developed it. Whether it’s a digital identity card or a digital profile used to monitor the social activity of schoolchildren, digitalization is what Shadayev craves.[Screen shot] Maksut isn’t just a patriot—he’s a visionary. And probably soon he will find a way to digitalize our vision, too. Removing Maksut from his post would be outrageous unless of course Putin were to find someone who loves digitalization even more than Maksut does. With or without Maksut, the Ministry of Digital Development will continue its important work of digitally developing every square inch of the Russian Federation.
Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov: For some weird reason the guy in charge of industry and trade in Russia has the largest (declared) income in the Russian government. This means he is an adept and highly qualified tradesman, of course.[Screen shots] The Collective West is developing bug burgers, which means that Russia must also develop its own bug burger technology in order to close the bug burger gap. This is common sense. And the best way to achieve this strategic bug burger victory is to allow Manturov to continue his important work. So please keep Denis in your thoughts and prayers as Putin assembles his new cabinet.
Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin: Replacing Mishustin with someone who didn’t participate in the World Economic Forum’s Cyber Polygon 2020 conference (co-hosted by Herman Gref) would be an absolute disaster for Russia. [Graphic] Mishustin is a world-class manager who knows how to delegate tasks and get stuff done. That’s why he issued a secret order in December 2020 designating a subsidiary of Herman Gref’s Sberbank as the sole supplier of Sputnik V to Russia’s regions. (Gref, an ex-member of the WEF’s Board of Trustees, relinquished this honor after his bank helped deliver the first few batches of an experimental genetic drug developed in cooperation with AstraZeneca. Please re-read that sentence. Let it sink in.) Mishustin also issued the order to establish a WEF-sponsored Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Russia. (The center formally suspended its activities in March 2022.)[Screen shot]
The current government is doing a great job, according to the chairman of the government, Mikhail Mishustin, and there’s really no reason why anything needs to change:[Screen shot] Putin’s inauguration is scheduled for May 7. The new government will be formed shortly after. Let’s just hope that Putin uses his awe-inspiring electoral mandate to make sure that every member of his cabinet has family who live in London. No more excuses![Photo, video]
My comment at the page.
Jeffrey Strahl, Lockdown Times, Apr 21
Thanks again, Riley.
When it comes to Putin and the Russian 4IR regime, the only fingers i' anticipate i;ll use are my middle ones. :-)
And, a look at the growing climate chaos/collapse by two Australians (Tasmania) who understand the core role of capitalism in this matter.
As climate collapse accelerates what do we do? …James Cox interviews the Just Collapse co-founders, Kate Booth and Tristan Sykes. 4/16/24. 48 minutes.
My comments.They live in Tasmania. “Just” is used as imperative (“Collapse, damn it”) as well as an adjective (as in “Justice”). Lots more to ecological crisis than climate change, and there is also iniquity and inequality. Collapse is inevitable, so how do we go with it? “Riding the Zeitgeist.”
The group’s page From the home page,
"Collapse
Mass biodiversity extinction, coupled with collapsing ecosystems and self-reinforcing climate feedback loops, immediately threaten humanity and all life on earth. We are in overshoot – using more than the Earth can sustain (e.g. consumption and population) and producing more pollutants than can be absorbed (e.g. CO2 and microplastics). Collapsologists document that infinite growth on a finite planet inevitably leads to overshoot and the transgression of ecological boundaries – six out of nine boundaries have already been crossed. Collapse is the result of exceeding these limits to growth, overwhelmingly by developed countries.
The hyper-growth entailed in transitioning to ‘clean’ energy and ‘sustainable’ technologies will push us even faster and further over these limits. It is also impossible given finite mineral availability. Terminating dependence on already depleted fossil fuels will collapse agriculture, economies, and societies. The removal of associated air pollution is already severely exacerbating climate change.
The nature and scale of economic reform required to bring us within ecological limits – for example, by moving from capitalism to degrowth – is synonymous with collapse. Collapse is inevitable, but justice is not.
Justice
Just Collapse acknowledges that responsibility for our current predicament predominantly lies with developed nations which have reaped profits and prosperity from capitalism, economic growth, colonialization, and industrialisation. We recognise that collapse exacerbates the violence already enacted upon people and places through these processes and that the effects of collapse are first felt by those already marginalised, disadvantaged, and dispossessed.
Just Collapse advocates for a Just Collapse and Planned Collapse which demonstrates and embodies these recognitions.”
Ending this segment and this edition, a new one about the 9/11 Truth Movement by Craig McKee.
Insistence on phony ‘unity’ undercuts 9/11 evidence and shields infiltrators. Part 1 of a series. Craig McKee, 4/14/24.
On the surface, it’s easy to make a case for unity in a political movement. When people with a common point of view come together to work towards a common goal, objectives can be reached. After all, who would want disunity? Who indeed. But we’ll get to that.
Yes, unity can be positive when activists are fighting for a cause – like saving a forest or stopping a war. We might think of 9/11 truth as such a cause, and it sort of is – but not exactly. The 9/11 Truth Movement is certainly unified in its position that the official story of the event is false.
We don’t think that Muslim extremists were behind the “attacks,” and we don’t think the Twin Towers came down because of plane impacts and fires. We don’t believe that falling debris from the North Tower caused the symmetrical collapse of Building 7. We agree that all three towers were instead brought down in some kind of explosive demolition. Most don’t think that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon or that Flight 93 crashed in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and buried itself underground.
The vast majority of 9/11 truthers have unity on the above, and that is hugely important. We may not all agree on every element of how this mass deception unfolded, but that’s okay; we don’t have to. The Truth Movement has never had complete unity, and yet it has exposed one of the greatest deceptions in history. All that has been achieved over 22 plus years has been done despite the absence of complete unity, not because of it.
We have exposed the lie.
This article is the first in a series (an open-ended one at this point) that will look at how truthers are allowing their movement to be led astray by harmful and superficial calls for phony “unity” and “civility.” The effect of all this is to cause us to abandon essential elements of our evidence to appease those who may actually be working covertly to defeat us……
The artificial “controversy” that has done such harm to the Truth Movement (focused mainly on the Pentagon) has been created by a group I have dubbed “the cabal.” Led by people like David Chandler, Ken Jenkins, Wayne Coste, and Jim Hoffman, this group appears to spend all its time telling us about the things they think the government is right about. They champion the authenticity of all the evidence the government has offered regarding the Pentagon, and they attack anyone who challenges that evidence.
Others involved in this disinformation effort include Fran Shure, Victoria Ashley, John Wyndham, Chris Sarns, Jonathan Cole, Chris Gruener, Dave Slesigner, Warren Stutt, Simon Falkner, Adam Fitzgerald, Nelson Martins, Ryan Dawson, Adam Taylor, Gregg Roberts, Frank Legge, John Bursill, Kevin Ryan, Dwain Deets, and others. (Anyone who feels they’ve been unfairly left off this list, just let me know in the comments below. I want each and every one of you to get all the credit you deserve.)……
I would argue that focusing one’s efforts on defending almost everything in the Pentagon official story, year after year after year, can’t be justified as “following the truth where it leads.” Also unjustifiable is the defense of propaganda by those who appear to think that unity is more important than truth………
The unity crowd has made it much easier for these people to do their damage. Under the guise of focusing on “what we all agree on,” crucial evidence of government complicity in the 9/11 false flag has been turned into something that is problematic to even speak of. The truth has been painted as divisive. The most respected and impactful 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, was taken in by this trick. For the first 10 years after 9/11, Griffin had no problem saying that the evidence overwhelmingly favored no 757 impact at the Pentagon. In fact, he maintained this view until his death. Unfortunately, he allowed himself to be pressured (and conned) into thinking that it’s best to put that crucial evidence on the back burner and focus instead on the fact that a plane piloted by al-Qaeda couldn’t have hit.
I said in 2011 that this was a disastrous mistake by Griffin, and time has proven me right. In chapter 7 of Griffin’s 2011 book 9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed, he tried to justify caving to the cabal, which I believe is a COINTELPRO operation. He called his new initiative a “consensus approach,” and he made a presentation on this at the Toronto Hearings that same year. All of this coincided with the creation of the 9/11 Consensus Panel, which Griffin formed with Elizabeth Woodworth. (I plan to write about the panel in a future article.)
In essence, Griffin was willing to set aside all the evidence that no 757 ever hit the Pentagon in the service of “unity,” or at least in a misguided attempt to combat “disunity.” In his book he called the question of whether a 757 hit the Pentagon “a relatively trivial point.” The cabal that pressured him to make this enormous concession must have been very happy with this.
[SNIP, lots more follows]…...
A comment at the page by the host of AE911Truth’s program “Free Fall,"
Andy Steele, Apr 14
Well written. Of course, I'm most disturbed by the behavior and sabotage that is exercised by the crowd that now pushes this phony "unity" call. Ironically, these people have perpetuated the most disunity of anyone in the movement, and I have a hard time believing it's genuine blind passion for their position. The gaslighting and dishonesty is just too thick to not be on purpose.
First of all, "unity" itself an empty catchphrase. It's like Obama's "Hope" and "Change." It's an easy thing to say that sounds uplifting without really offering any substance.
What does it mean for 9/11 Truth? You have to deal with every crazy person that shows up? Someone displaying dishonest and destructive behavior, you're obligated to put up with it? People threatening your organization when they can't manipulate it... hey, it's cool. They happened to watch the same YouTube videos as you about 9/11, and they SAY they're a truther, so...
This attitude wouldn't fly for any successful group in the real world. (When I tell friends outside the movement of some of the insane shit I've had to encounter, they're like "WTF None of that makes any sense.") What a perfect umbrella standard to shield agents from consequences. Just keep them planted to cause problems whenever any progress might start happening and tell anyone who calls them out or refuses to work with them that they're the ones who are being "divisive." It's so brazenly manipulative, I'm baffled as to how people can't see this.
Unfortunately, the culture of this attitude was pushed for so long by certain leaders (mainly I'm thinking of one) who were more concerned with their bottom-line and being surrounded by groupies that flatter them, that they enabled it and it became entrenched. Normal people who could have been helpful and productive got scared away and the movement was left with this very vocal and toxic clique that are now trying to act as gatekeeper brownshirts if anyone dare question the actions of those they're trying to push as the 9/11 pharisees. It's such a shame, and those people who died on 9/11 deserve so much better.
Thank you, Craig, for having the balls and energy to write the things that should have been said a long time ago. Kind of ironic that there's so few actual voices of truth in a truth movement. Of course, I try not to reference "the movement" these days because it's unfortunately mixed with a lot of slimy opportunists that have turned it into more an industry. I don't do anything for "the movement" anymore. I do it for "the cause," which is way more important.
Check out this late entry on McKee’s Substack, i will listen and report.
Truth and Shadows podcast kicks off!. Craig McKee and Adam Ruff discuss the ups and downs of truth seeking and battling 9/11 infiltration. Craig McKee, 4/22/24.
What a wealth of information. One thing I remember about AIDS was a report that came out after the fall of Russia/communism. The KGB report stated that HIV was a bacterial warfare invention created in the United States. It was just a blip but it caught my attention. Right after the fall things like this popped up